ISIS UNVEILED

*ISIS UNVEILED

A MASTER‐KEY

TO THE

MYSTERIES OF ANCIENT AND MODERN

SCIENCE AND THEOLOGY

BY
H. P. BLAVATSKY,

CORRESPONDING SECRETARY OF THE THEOSOPHICAL SOCIETY

ʺCecy est un livre de bonne Foy.ʺ — MONTAIGNE

―――――

VOL. I – SCIENCE

―――――

Copyright©2006 Theosophy Trust

Easy‐Read® Format by Theosophy Trust

THE AUTHOR

DEDICATES THESE VOLUMES

TO THE

THEOSOPHICAL SOCIETY,

WHICH WAS FOUNDED AT NEW YORK, A.D. 1875,

TO STUDY THE SUBJECTS ON WHICH THEY TREAT.

PREFACE

THE work now submitted to public judgment is the fruit of a somewhat intimate acquaintance with Eastern adepts and study of their science. It is offered to such as are willing to accept truth wherever it may be found, and to defend it, even looking popular prejudice straight in the face. It is an attempt to aid the student to detect the vital principles which underlie the philosophical systems of old.

The book is written in all sincerity. It is meant to do even justice, and to speak the truth alike without malice or prejudice. But it shows neither mercy for enthroned error, nor reverence for usurped authority. It demands for a spoliated past, that credit for its achievements which has been too long withheld. It calls for a restitution of borrowed robes, and the vindication of calumniated but glorious reputations. Toward no form of worship, no religious faith, no scientific hypothesis has its criticism been directed in any other spirit. Men and parties, sects and schools are but the mere ephemera of the worldʹs day. TRUTH, high‐seated upon its rock of adamant, is alone eternal and supreme.

We believe in no Magic which transcends the scope and capacity of the human mind, nor in ʺmiracle,ʺ whether divine or diabolical, if such imply a transgression of the laws of nature instituted from all eternity. Nevertheless, we accept the saying of the gifted author of Festus, that the human heart has not yet fully uttered itself, and that we have never attained or even understood the extent of its powers. Is it too much to believe that man should be developing new sensibilities and a closer relation with nature? The logic of evolution must teach as much, if carried to its legitimate conclusions. If, somewhere, in the line of ascent from vegetable or ascidian to the noblest man a soul was evolved, gifted with intellectual qualities, it cannot be unreasonable to infer and believe that a faculty of perception is also growing in man, enabling him to descry facts and truths even beyond our ordinary ken. Yet we do not hesitate to accept the assertion of Biffé, that ʺthe essential is forever the same. Whether we cut away the marble inward that hides the statue in the block, or pile stone

iii

upon stone outward till the temple is completed, our NEW result is only an old idea. The latest of all the eternities will find its destined other half‐soul in the earliest.ʺ When, years ago, we first travelled over the East, exploring the penetralia of its deserted sanctuaries, two saddening and ever‐recurring questions oppressed our thoughts: Where, WHO, WHAT is GOD? Who ever saw the IMMORTAL SPIRIT of man, so as to be able to assure himself of manʹs immortality?

It was while most anxious to solve these perplexing problems that we came into contact with certain men, endowed with such mysterious powers and such profound knowledge that we may truly designate them as the sages of the Orient. To their instructions we lent a ready ear. They showed us that by combining science with religion, the existence of God and immortality of manʹs spirit may be demonstrated like a problem of Euclid. For the first time we received the assurance that the Oriental philosophy has room for no other faith than an absolute and immovable faith in the omnipotence of manʹs own immortal self. We were taught that this omnipotence comes from the kinship of manʹs spirit with the Universal Soul — God! The latter, they said, can never be demonstrated but by the former. Man‐spirit proves God‐spirit, as the one drop of water proves a source from which it must have come. Tell one who had never seen water, that there is an ocean of water, and he must accept it on faith or reject it altogether. But let one drop fall upon his hand, and he then has the fact from which all the rest may be inferred. After that he could by degrees understand that a boundless and fathomless ocean of water existed. Blind faith would no longer be necessary; he would have supplanted it with KNOWLEDGE. When one sees mortal man displaying tremendous capabilities, controlling the forces of nature and opening up to view the world of spirit, the reflective mind is overwhelmed with the conviction that if one manʹs spiritual Ego can do this much, the capabilities of the FATHER SPIRIT must be relatively as much vaster as the whole ocean surpasses the single drop in volume and potency. Ex nihilo nihil fit; prove the soul of man by its wondrous powers — you have proved God! In our studies, mysteries were shown to be no mysteries. Names and places that to the Western mind have only a significance derived from Eastern fable, were shown to be realities. Reverently we stepped in spirit within the temple of Isis; to lift aside the veil of ʺthe one that is and was and shall beʺ at Saïs; to look through the rent curtain of the Sanctum Sanctorum at Jerusalem; and even to interrogate within the crypts which once existed

iv

beneath the sacred edifice, the mysterious Bath‐Kol. The Filia Vocis — the daughter of the divine voice — responded from the mercy‐seat within the veil,* and science, theology, every human hypothesis and conception born of imperfect knowledge, lost forever their authoritative character in our sight. The one‐living God had spoken through his oracle—man, and we were satisfied. Such knowledge is priceless; and it has been hidden only from those who overlooked it, derided it, or denied its existence.

From such as these we apprehend criticism, censure, and perhaps hostility, although the obstacles in our way neither spring from the validity of proof, the authenticated facts of history, nor the lack of common sense among the public whom we address. The drift of modern thought is palpably in the direction of liberalism in religion as well as science. Each day brings the reactionists nearer to the point where they must surrender the despotic authority over the public conscience, which they have so long enjoyed and exercised. When the Pope can go to the extreme of fulminating anathemas against all who maintain the liberty of the Press and of speech, or who insist that in the conflict of laws, civil and ecclesiastical, the civil law should prevail, or that any method of instruction solely secular, may be approved;† and Mr. Tyndall, as the mouth‐piece of nineteenth century science, says, ʺ. . . the impregnable position of science may be stated in a few words: we claim, and we shall wrest from theology, the entire domain of cosmological theoryʺ‡—the end is not difficult to foresee.

Centuries of subjection have not quite congealed the life‐blood of men into crystals around the nucleus of blind faith; and the nineteenth is witnessing the struggles of the giant as he shakes off the Liliputian cordage and rises to his feet. Even the Protestant communion of England and America, now engaged in the revision of the text of its Oracles, will be compelled to show the origin and merits of the text itself. The day of domineering over men with dogmas has reached its gloaming.

* Lightfoot assures us that this voice, which had been used in times past for a testimony from heaven, ʺwas indeed performed by magic artʺ (vol. ii., p. 128). This latter term is used as a supercilious expression, just because it was and is still misunderstood. It is the object of this work to correct the erroneous opinions concerning ʺmagic art.ʺ
† Encyclical of 1864.

‡ ʺFragments of Science.ʺ

v

Our work, then, is a plea for the recognition of the Hermetic philosophy, the anciently universal Wisdom‐Religion, as the only possible key to the Absolute in science and theology. To show that we do not at all conceal from ourselves the gravity of our undertaking, we may say in advance that it would not be strange if the following classes should array themselves against us:

The Christians, who will see that we question the evidences of the genuineness of their faith. The Scientists, who will find their pretensions placed in the same bundle with those of the Roman Catholic Church for infallibility, and, in certain particulars, the sages and philosophers of the ancient world classed higher than they. Pseudo‐Scientists will, of course, denounce us furiously. Broad Churchmen and Freethinkers will find that we do not accept what they do, but demand the recognition of the whole truth. Men of letters and various authorities, who hide their real belief in deference to popular prejudices. The mercenaries and parasites of the Press, who prostitute its more than royal power, and dishonor a noble profession, will find it easy to mock at things too wonderful for them to understand; for to them the price of a paragraph is more than the value of sincerity. From many will come honest criticism; from many — cant. But we look to the future. The contest now going on between the party of public conscience and the party of reaction, has already developed a healthier tone of thought. It will hardly fail to result ultimately in the overthrow of error and the triumph of Truth. We repeat again — we are laboring for the brighter morrow. And yet, when we consider the bitter opposition that we are called upon to face, who is better entitled than we upon entering the arena to write upon our shield the hail of the Roman gladiator to Cæsar:

MORITURUS TE SALUTÂT!

New York, September, 1877

vi

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PREFACE ..................................................................................................................................... iii

BEFORE THE VEIL

DOGMATIC ASSUMPTIONS OF MODERN SCIENCE AND THEOLOGY.........................................
xviii

THE PLATONIC PHILOSOPHY AFFORDS THE ONLY MIDDLE GROUND ........................................
xx

REVIEW OF THE ANCIENT PHILOSOPHICAL SYSTEMS...............................................................
xxiii

A SYRIAC MANUSCRIPT ON SIMON MAGUS ...............................................................................
xxx

GLOSSARY OF TERMS USED IN THIS BOOK ...............................................................................
xxxi

VOLUME FIRST

THE ʺINFALLIBILITYʺ OF MODERN SCIENCE

vii

CHAPTER I

OLD THINGS WITH NEW NAMES

THE ORIENTAL KABALA 1
ANCIENT TRADITIONS SUPPORTED BY MODERN RESEARCH 2
THE PROGRESS OF MANKIND MARKED BY CYCLES 4

ANCIENT CRYPTIC SCIENCE 6
PRICELESS VALUE OF THE VEDAS 10
MUTILATIONS OF THE JEWISH SACRED BOOKS IN TRANSLATION 11
MAGIC ALWAYS REGARDED AS A DIVINE SCIENCE 22
ACHIEVEMENTS OF ITS ADEPTS AND HYPOTHESES OF THEIR MODERN DETRACTORS 22
MANʹS YEARNING FOR IMMORTALITY 32

CHAPTER II

PHENOMENA AND FORCES

THE SERVILITY OF SOCIETY 34
PREJUDICE AND BIGOTRY OF MEN OF SCIENCE 35

THEY ARE CHASED BY PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA 36
LOST ARTS 43
THE HUMAN WILL THE MASTER‐FORCE OF FORCES 50
SUPERFICIAL GENERALIZATIONS OF THE FRENCH SAVANTS 53
MEDIUMISTIC PHENOMENA, TO WHAT ATTRIBUTABLE 59

viii

THEIR RELATION TO CRIME 63

CHAPTER III

BLIND LEADERS OF THE BLIND

HUXLEYʹS DERIVATION FROM THE OROHIPPUS 65
COMTE, HIS SYSTEM AND DISCIPLES 66
THE LONDON MATERIALISTS 75

BORROWED ROBES 79
EMANATION OF THE OBJECTIVE UNIVERSE FROM THE SUBJECTIVE 82

CHAPTER IV

THEORIES RESPECTING PSYCHIC PHENOMENA

THEORY OF DE GASPARIN 88
THEORY OF THURY 88
THEORY OF DES MOUSSEAUX, DE MIRVILLE 88

THEORY OF BABINET 89
THEORY OF HOUDIN 90
THEORY OF MM. ROYER AND JOBART DE LAMBALLE 90
THE TWINS ʺUNCONSCIOUS CEREBRATIONʺ AND ʺUNCONSCIOUS VENTRILOQUISMʺ 93
THEORY OF CROOKES 99

ix

THEORY OF FARADAY 103
THEORY OF CHEVREUIL 103
THE MENDELEYEFF COMMISSION OF 1876 104
SOUL BLINDNESS 107

CHAPTER V

THE ETHER, OR ʺASTRAL LIGHTʺ

ONE PRIMAL FORCE, BUT MANY CORRELATIONS 111
TYNDALL NARROWLY ESCAPES A GREAT DISCOVERY 113
THE IMPOSSIBILITY OF MIRACLE 114
NATURE OF THE PRIMORDIAL SUBSTANCE 118
INTERPRETATION OF CERTAIN ANCIENT MYTHS 119
EXPERIMENTS OF THE FAKIRS 123

EVOLUTION IN HINDU ALLEGORY 136

CHAPTER VI

PSYCHO‐PHYSICAL PHENOMENA

THE DEBT WE OWE TO PARACELSUS 145
MESMERISM — ITS PARENTAGE, RECEPTION, POTENTIALITY 146
ʺPSYCHOMETRYʺ 162

x

TIME, SPACE, ETERNITY 163
TRANSFER OF ENERGY FROM THE VISIBLE TO THE INVISIBLE UNIVERSE 165
THE CROOKES EXPERIMENTS AND COX THEORY 174

CHAPTER VII

THE ELEMENTS, ELEMENTALS, AND ELEMENTARIES

ATTRACTION AND REPULSION UNIVERSAL IN ALL THE KINGDOMS OF NATURE 183
PSYCHICAL PHENOMENA DEPEND ON PHYSICAL SURROUNDINGS 188
OBSERVATIONS IN SIAM 191
MUSIC IN NERVOUS DISORDERS 192
THE ʺWORLD‐SOULʺ AND ITS POTENTIALITIES 193
HEALING BY TOUCH, AND HEALERS 193
ʺDIAKKAʺ AND PORPHYRYʹS BAD DEMONS 195

THE QUENCHLESS LAMP 200
MODERN IGNORANCE OF VITAL FORCE 212
ANTIQUITY OF THE THEORY OF FORCE‐CORRELATION 215
UNIVERSALITY OF BELIEF IN MAGIC 221

CHAPTER VIII

SOME MYSTERIES OF NATURE

xi

DO THE PLANETS AFFECT HUMAN DESTINY? 226
VERY CURIOUS PASSAGE FROM HERMES 227
THE RESTLESSNESS OF MATTER 229
PROPHECY OF NOSTRADAMUS FULFILLED 232

SYMPATHIES BETWEEN PLANETS AND PLANTS 236
HINDU KNOWLEDGE OF THE PROPERTIES OF COLORS 236
ʺCOINCIDENCESʺ THE PANACEA OF MODERN SCIENCE 240
THE MOON AND THE TIDES 244
EPIDEMIC MENTAL AND MORAL DISORDERS 245
THE GODS OF THE PANTHEONS ONLY NATURAL FORCES 250

PROOFS OF THE MAGICAL POWERS OF PYTHAGORAS 253
THE VIEWLESS RACES OF ETHEREAL SPACE 254
THE ʺFOUR TRUTHSʺ OF BUDDHISM 260

CHAPTER IX

CYCLIC PHENOMENA

MEANING OF THE EXPRESSION ʺCOATS OF SKINʺ 262
NATURAL SELECTION AND ITS RESULTS 264

THE EGYPTIAN ʺCIRCLE OF NECESSITYʺ 265
PRE‐ADAMITE RACES 268
DESCENT OF SPIRIT INTO MATTER 270
THE TRIUNE NATURE OF MAN 276

THE LOWEST CREATURES IN THE SCALE OF BEING 277

xii

ELEMENTALS SPECIFICALLY DESCRIBED 279
PROCLUS ON THE BEINGS OF THE AIR 279
VARIOUS NAMES FOR ELEMENTALS 281
SWEDENBORGIAN VIEWS ON SOUL‐DEATH 284

EARTH‐BOUND HUMAN SOULS 286
IMPURE MEDIUMS AND THEIR ʺGUIDESʺ 291
PSYCHOMETRY AN AID TO SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH 298

CHAPTER X

THE INNER AND OUTER MAN

PERE FELIX ARRAIGNS THE SCIENTISTS 302
THE ʺUNKNOWABLEʺ 304
DANGER OF EVOCATIONS BY TYROS 306
LARES AND LEMURES 308
SECRETS OF HINDU TEMPLES 313
REINCARNATION 314
WITCHCRAFT AND WITCHES 315

THE SACRED SOMA TRANCE 319

VULNERABILITY OF CERTAIN ʺSHADOWSʺ 324
EXPERIMENT OF CLEARCHUS ON A SLEEPING BOY 326
THE AUTHOR WITNESSES A TRIAL OF MAGIC IN INDIA 329
CASE OF THE CEVENNOIS 331

xiii

CHAPTER XI

PSYCHOLOGICAL AND PHYSICAL MARVELS

INVULNERABILITY ATTAINABLE BY MAN 338
PROJECTING THE FORCE OF THE WILL 339

INSENSIBILITY TO SNAKE‐POISON 340
CHARMING SERPENTS BY MUSIC 342
TERATOLOGICAL PHENOMENA DISCUSSED 344
THE PSYCHOLOGICAL DOMAIN CONFESSEDLY UNEXPLORED 363
DESPAIRING REGRETS OF BERZELIUS 368
TURNING A RIVER INTO BLOOD A VEGETABLE PHENOMENON 370

CHAPTER XII

THE ʺIMPASSABLE CHASMʺ

CONFESSIONS OF IGNORANCE BY MEN OF SCIENCE 373
THE PANTHEON OF NIHILISM 377
TRIPLE COMPOSITION OF FIRE 379

INSTINCT AND REASON DEFINED 380
PHILOSOPHY OF THE HINDU JAINS 384
DELIBERATE MISREPRESENTATIONS OF LEMPRIERE 386
MANʹS ASTRAL SOUL NOT IMMORTAL 387
THE REINCARNATION OF BUDDHA 391

xiv

MAGICAL SUN AND MOON PICTURES OF THIBET 396
VAMPIRISM — ITS PHENOMENA EXPLAINED 402
BENGALESE JUGGLERY 410

CHAPTER XIII

REALITIES AND ILLUSION

THE RATIONALE OF TALISMANS 414
UNEXPLAINED MYSTERIES 418
MAGICAL EXPERIMENT IN BENGAL 420
CHIBH CHONDORʹS SURPRISING FEATS 423
THE INDIAN TAPE‐CLIMBING TRICK AN ILLUSION 425

RESUSCITATION OF BURIED FAKIRS 428
LIMITS OF SUSPENDED ANIMATION 432
MEDIUMSHIP TOTALLY ANTAGONISTIC TO ADEPTSHIP 437
WHAT ARE ʺMATERIALIZED SPIRITSʺ? 443
THE SHUDALA MADAN 444
PHILOSOPHY OF LEVITATION 446

THE ELIXIR AND ALKAHEST 452

xv

CHAPTER XIV

EGYPTIAN WISDOM

ORIGIN OF THE EGYPTIANS 462
THEIR MIGHTY ENGINEERING WORKS 464

THE ANCIENT LAND OF THE PHARAOHS 468
ANTIQUITY OF THE NILOTIC MONUMENTS 475
ARTS OF WAR AND PEACE 476
MEXICAN MYTHS AND RUINS 489
RESEMBLANCES TO THE EGYPTIAN 495
MOSES A PRIEST OF OSIRIS 498

THE LESSONS TAUGHT BY THE RUINS OF SIAM 505
THE EGYPTIAN TAU AT PALENQUE 514

CHAPTER XV

INDIA THE CRADLE OF THE RACE

ACQUISITION OF THE ʺSECRET DOCTRINEʺ 516
TWO RELICS OWNED BY A PALI SCHOLAR 518
JEALOUS EXCLUSIVENESS OF THE HINDUS 519
LYDIA MARIA CHILD ON PHALLIC SYMBOLISM 524
THE AGE OF THE VEDAS AND MANU 527

xvi

TRADITIONS OF PRE‐DILUVIAN RACES 529
ATLANTIS AND ITS PEOPLES 532
PERUVIAN RELICS 536
THE GOBI DESERT AND ITS SECRETS 538

THIBETAN AND CHINESE LEGENDS 539
THE MAGICIAN AIDS, NOT IMPEDES, NATURE 555
PHILOSOPHY, RELIGION, ARTS AND SCIENCES BEQUEATHED BY
MOTHER INDIA TO POSTERITY 556
Isis Unveiled

BEFORE THE VEIL

Joan. — Advance our waving colors on the walls! —
King Henry VI. Act IV

ʺMy life has been devoted to the study of man, his destiny and his happiness.ʺ —

J. R. BUCHANAN, M.D.,
Outlines of Lectures on Anthropology

IT is nineteen centuries since, as we are told, the night of Heathenism and Paganism was first dispelled by the divine light of Christianity; and two‐and‐a‐half centuries since the bright lamp of Modern Science began to shine on the darkness of the ignorance of the ages. Within these respective epochs, we are required to believe, the true moral and intellectual progress of the race has occurred. The ancient philosophers were well enough for their respective generations, but they were illiterate as compared with modern men of science.

DOGMATIC ASSUMPTIONS OF MODERN SCIENCE AND
THEOLOGY

The ethics of Paganism perhaps met the wants of the uncultivated people of antiquity, but not until the advent of the luminous ʺStar of Bethlehem,ʺ was the true road to moral perfection and the way to salvation made plain. Of old, brutishness was the rule, virtue and spirituality the exception.

Now, the dullest may read the will of God in His revealed word; men have every incentive to be good, and are constantly becoming better.

This is the assumption; what are the facts? On the one hand an unspiritual, dogmatic, too often debauched clergy; a host of sects, and three warring great religions; discord instead of union, dogmas without proofs, sensation‐loving preachers, and wealth and pleasure‐seeking parishionersʹ hypocrisy and bigotry, begotten by the tyrannical exigencies of respectability, the rule of the day, sincerity and real piety exceptional. On the other hand, scientific hypotheses built on sand; no accord upon a single question; rancorous quarrels and jealousy; a general drift into materialism. A death‐ grapple of Science with Theology for infallibility — ʺa conflict of ages.ʺ

At Rome, the self‐styled seat of Christianity, the putative successor to the chair of Peter is undermining social order with his invisible but omnipresent net‐work of bigoted agents, and incites them to revolutionize Europe for his temporal as well as spiritual supremacy. We see him who calls himself the ʺVicar of Christ,ʺ fraternizing with the anti‐ Christian Moslem against another Christian nation, publicly invoking the blessing of God upon the arms of those who have for centuries withstood, with fire and sword, the pretensions of his Christ to Godhood! At Berlin — one of the great seats of learning — professors of modern exact sciences, turning their backs on the boasted results of enlightenment of the post‐Galileonian period, are quietly snuffing out the

xviii

Isis Unveiled

candle of the great Florentine; seeking, in short, to prove the heliocentric system, and even the earthʹs rotation, but the dreams of deluded scientists, Newton a visionary, and all past and present astronomers but clever calculators of unverifiable problems.*

Between these two conflicting Titans — Science and Theology — is a bewildered public, fast losing all belief in manʹs personal immortality, in a deity of any kind, and rapidly descending to the level of a mere animal existence. Such is the picture of the hour, illumined by the bright noonday sun of this Christian and scientific era!

Would it be strict justice to condemn to critical lapidation the most humble and modest of authors for entirely rejecting the authority of both these combatants? Are we not bound rather to take as the true aphorism of this century, the declaration of Horace Greeley: ʺI accept unreservedly the views of no man, living or deadʺ?† Such, at all events, will be our motto, and we mean that principle to be our constant guide throughout this work.

Among the many phenomenal outgrowths of our century, the strange creed of the so‐called Spiritualists has arisen amid the tottering ruins of self‐styled revealed religions and materialistic philosophies; and yet it alone offers a possible last refuge of compromise between the two. That this unexpected ghost of pre‐Christian days finds poor welcome

* See the last chapter of this volume, p. 622.

† ʺRecollections of a Busy Life,ʺ p. 147.

from our sober and positive century, is not surprising. Times have strangely changed; and it is but recently that a well‐ known Brooklyn preacher pointedly remarked in a sermon, that could Jesus come back and behave in the streets of New York, as he did in those of Jerusalem, he would find himself confined in the prison of the Tombs.‡ What sort of welcome, then, could Spiritualism ever expect? True enough, the weird stranger seems neither attractive nor promising at first sight. Shapeless and uncouth, like an infant attended by seven nurses, it is coming out of its teens lame and mutilated. The name of its enemies is legion; its friends and protectors are a handful. But what of that? When was ever truth accepted a priori? Because the champions of Spiritualism have in their fanaticism magnified its qualities, and remained blind to its imperfections, that gives no excuse to doubt its reality. A forgery is impossible when we have no model to forge after. The fanaticism of Spiritualists is itself a proof of the genuineness and possibility of their phenomena. They give us facts that we may investigate, not assertions that we must believe without proof. Millions of reasonable men and women do not so easily succumb to collective hallucination. And so, while the clergy, following their own interpretations of the Bible, and science its self‐made Codex of possibilities in nature, refuse it a fair hearing, real science and true religion are silent, and gravely wait further developments.

‡ Henry Ward Beecher.

xix

Isis Unveiled

THE PLATONIC PHILOSOPHY AFFORDS THE ONLY
MIDDLE GROUND

The whole question of phenomena rests on the correct comprehension of old philosophies. Whither, then, should we turn, in our perplexity, but to the ancient sages, since, on the pretext of superstition, we are refused an explanation by the modern? Let us ask them what they know of genuine science and religion; not in the matter of mere details, but in all the broad conception of these twin truths — so strong in their unity, so weak when divided. Besides, we may find our profit in comparing this boasted modern science with ancient ignorance; this improved modern theology with the ʺSecret doctrinesʺ of the ancient universal religion. Perhaps we may thus discover a neutral ground whence we can reach and profit by both.

It is the Platonic philosophy, the most elaborate compend of the abstruse systems of old India, that can alone afford us this middle ground. Although twenty‐two and a quarter centuries have elapsed since the death of Plato, the great minds of the world are still occupied with his writings. He was, in the fullest sense of the word, the worldʹs interpreter. And the greatest philosopher of the pre‐Christian era mirrored faithfully in his works the spiritualism of the Vedic philosophers who lived thousands of years before himself, and its metaphysical expression. Vyasa, Djeminy, Kapila, Vrihaspati, Sumati, and so many others, will be found to have transmitted their indelible imprint through the intervening

centuries upon Plato and his school. Thus is warranted the inference that to Plato and the ancient Hindu sages was alike revealed the same wisdom. So surviving the shock of time, what can this wisdom be but divine and eternal?

Plato taught justice as subsisting in the soul of its possessor and his greatest good. ʺMen, in proportion to their intellect, have admitted his transcendent claims.ʺ Yet his commentators, almost with one consent, shrink from every passage which implies that his metaphysics are based on a solid foundation, and not on ideal conceptions.

But Plato could not accept a philosophy destitute of spiritual aspirations; the two were at one with him. For the old Grecian sage there was a single object of attainment: REAL KNOWLEDGE. He considered those only to be genuine philosophers, or students of truth, who possess the knowledge of the really‐existing, in opposition to the mere seeing; of the always‐existing, in opposition to the transitory; and of that which exists permanently, in opposition to that which waxes, wanes, and is developed and destroyed alternately. ʺBeyond all finite existences and secondary causes, all laws, ideas, and principles, there is an INTELLIGENCE or MIND [νοῦς, nous , the spirit], the first principle of all principles, the Supreme Idea on which all other ideas are grounded; the Monarch and Lawgiver of the universe; the ultimate substance from which all things derive their being and essence, the first and efficient Cause of all the order, and harmony, and beauty, and excellency, and goodness, which pervades the universe — who is called, by

xx

Isis Unveiled

way of preëminence and excellence, the Supreme Good, the God (ὁ θεὸς) ʹthe God over allʹ (ὁ επι πασι θεὸς).ʺ* He is not the truth nor the intelligence, but ʺthe father of it.ʺ Though this eternal essence of things may not be perceptible by our physical senses, it may be apprehended by the mind of those who are not wilfully obtuse. ʺTo you,ʺ said Jesus to his elect disciples, ʺit is given to know the mysteries of the Kingdom of God, but to them [the πολλοἳ] it is not given; . . . therefore speak I to them in parables [or allegories]; because they seeing, see not, and hearing, they hear not, neither do they understand.ʺ†

The philosophy of Plato, we are assured by Porphyry, of the Neoplatonic School was taught and illustrated in the MYSTERIES. Many have questioned and even denied this; and Lobeck, in his Aglaophomus, has gone to the extreme of representing the sacred orgies as little more than an empty show to captivate the imagination. As though Athens and Greece would for twenty centuries and more have repaired every fifth year to Eleusis to witness a solemn religious farce! Augustine, the papa‐bishop of Hippo, has resolved such assertions. He declares that the doctrines of the Alexandrian Platonists were the original esoteric doctrines of the first followers of Plato, and describes Plotinus as a Plato resuscitated. He also explains the motives of the great

* Cocker, ʺChristianity and Greek Philosophy,ʺ xi., p. 377.

† Gospel According to Matthew, xiii. 11, 13.

philosopher for veiling the interior sense of what he taught.‡

As to the myths, Plato declares in the Gorgias and the Phædon that they were the vehicles of great truths well worth the seeking. But commentators are so little en rapport with the great philosopher as to be compelled to acknowledge that they are ignorant where ʺthe doctrinal ends, and the mythical begins.ʺ Plato put to flight the popular superstition concerning magic and dæmons, and developed the exaggerated notions of the time into rational theories and metaphysical conceptions. Perhaps these would not quite stand the inductive method of reasoning established by

‡ ʺThe accusations of atheism, the introducing of foreign deities, and corrupting of the Athenian youth, which were made against Socrates, afforded ample justification for Plato to conceal the arcane preaching of his doctrines. Doubtless the peculiar diction or ʹjargonʹ of the alchemists was employed for a like purpose. The dungeon, the rack, and the fagot were employed without scruple by Christians of every shade, the Roman Catholics especially, against all who taught even natural science contrary to the theories entertained by the Church. Pope Gregory the Great even inhibited the grammatical use of Latin as heathenish. The offense of Socrates consisted in unfolding to his disciples the arcane doctrine concerning the gods, which was taught in the Mysteries and was a capital crime. He also was charged by Aristophanes with introducing the new god Dinos into the republic as the demiurgos or artificer, and the lord of the solar universe. The Heliocentric system was also a doctrine of the Mysteries; and hence, when Aristarchus the Pythagorean taught it openly, Cleanthes declared that the Greeks ought to have called him to account and condemned him for blasphemy against the gods,ʺ — (ʺPlutarchʺ). But Socrates had never been initiated, and hence divulged nothing which had ever been imparted to him.

xxi

Isis Unveiled

Aristotle; nevertheless they are satisfactory in the highest degree to those who apprehend the existence of that higher faculty of insight or intuition, as affording a criterion for ascertaining truth.

Basing all his doctrines upon the presence of the Supreme Mind, Plato taught that the nous, spirit, or rational soul of man, being ʺgenerated by the Divine Father,ʺ possessed a nature kindred, or even homogeneous, with the Divinity, and was capable of beholding the eternal realities. This faculty of contemplating reality in a direct and immediate manner belongs to God alone; the aspiration for this knowledge constitutes what is really meant by philosophy — the love of wisdom. The love of truth is inherently the love of good; and so predominating over every desire of the soul, purifying it and assimilating it to the divine, thus governing every act of the individual, it raises man to a participation and communion with Divinity, and restores him to the likeness of God. ʺThis flight,ʺ says Plato in the Theætetus, ʺconsists in becoming like God, and this assimilation is the becoming just and holy with wisdom.ʺ

The basis of this assimilation is always asserted to be the preëxistence of the spirit or nous. In the allegory of the chariot and winged steeds, given in the Phædrus, he represents the psychical nature as composite and two‐fold; the thumos, or epithumetic part, formed from the substances of the world of phenomena; and the qumoeidevʺ thumoeides, the essence of which is linked to the eternal world. The present earth‐life is a fall and punishment. The soul dwells in ʺthe grave which

we call the body,ʺ and in its incorporate state, and previous to the discipline of education, the noetic or spiritual element is ʺasleep.ʺ Life is thus a dream, rather than a reality. Like the captives in the subterranean cave, described in The Republic, the back is turned to the light, we perceive only the shadows of objects, and think them the actual realities. Is not this the idea of Maya, or the illusion of the senses in physical life, which is so marked a feature in Buddhistical philosophy? But these shadows, if we have not given ourselves up absolutely to the sensuous nature, arouse in us the reminiscence of that higher world that we once inhabited. ʺThe interior spirit has some dim and shadowy recollection of its antenatal state of bliss, and some instinctive and proleptic yearnings for its return.ʺ It is the province of the discipline of philosophy to disinthrall it from the bondage of sense, and raise it into the empyrean of pure thought, to the vision of eternal truth, goodness, and beauty. ʺThe soul,ʺ says Plato, in the Theætetus, ʺcannot come into the form of a man if it has never seen the truth. This is a recollection of those things which our soul formerly saw when journeying with Deity, despising the things which we now say are, and looking up to that which REALLY IS. Wherefore the nous, or spirit, of the philosopher (or student of the higher truth) alone is furnished with wings; because he, to the best of his ability, keeps these things in mind, of which the contemplation renders even Deity itself divine. By making the right use of these things remembered from the former life, by constantly perfecting himself in the perfect mysteries, a man becomes truly perfect — an initiate

xxii

Isis Unveiled

into the diviner wisdom.ʺ

Hence we may understand why the sublimer scenes in the Mysteries were always in the night. The life of the interior spirit is the death of the external nature; and the night of the physical world denotes the day of the spiritual. Dionysus, the night‐sun, is, therefore, worshipped rather than Helios, orb of day. In the Mysteries were symbolized the preëxistent condition of the spirit and soul, and the lapse of the latter into earth‐life and Hades, the miseries of that life, the purification of the soul, and its restoration to divine bliss, or reunion with spirit. Theon, of Smyrna, aptly compares the philosophical discipline to the mystic rites: ʺPhilosophy,ʺ says he, ʺmay be called the initiation into the true arcana, and the instruction in the genuine Mysteries. There are five parts of this initiation: I., the previous purification; II., the admission to participation in the arcane rites; III., the epoptic revelation; IV., the investiture or enthroning; V. — the fifth, which is produced from all these, is friendship and interior communion with God, and the enjoyment of that felicity which arises from intimate converse with divine beings. . . . Plato denominates the epopteia, or personal view, the perfect contemplation of things which are apprehended intuitively, absolute truths and ideas. He also considers the binding of the head and crowning as analogous to the authority which any one receives from his instructors, of leading others into the same contemplation. The fifth gradation is the most perfect felicity arising from hence, and, according to Plato, an assimilation to

divinity as far as is possible to human beings.ʺ*

REVIEW OF THE ANCIENT PHILOSOPHICAL SYSTEMS

Such is Platonism. ʺOut of Plato,ʺ says Ralph Waldo Emerson, ʺcome all things that are still written and debated among men of thought.ʺ He absorbed the learning of his times — of Greece from Philolaus to Socrates; then of Pythagoras in Italy; then what he could procure from Egypt and the East. He was so broad that all philosophy, European and Asiatic, was in his doctrines; and to culture and contemplation he added the nature and qualities of the poet.

The followers of Plato generally adhered strictly to his psychological theories. Several, however, like Xenocrates, ventured into bolder speculations. Speusippus, the nephew and successor of the great philosopher, was the author of the Numerical Analysis, a treatise on the Pythagorean numbers. Some of his speculations are not found in the written Dialogues; but as he was a listener to the unwritten lectures of Plato, the judgment of Enfield is doubtless correct, that he did not differ from his master. He was evidently, though not named, the antagonist whom Aristotle criticised, when professing to cite the argument of Plato against the doctrine of Pythagoras, that all things were in themselves numbers, or rather, inseparable from the idea of numbers. He especially endeavored to show that the Platonic doctrine of ideas

* See Thomas Taylor, ʺEleusinian and Bacchic Mysteries,ʺ p. 47. New York: J. W. Bouton, 1875.

xxiii

Isis Unveiled

differed essentially from the Pythagorean, in that it presupposed numbers and magnitudes to exist apart from things. He also asserted that Plato taught that there could be no real knowledge, if the object of that knowledge was not carried beyond or above the sensible.

But Aristotle was no trustworthy witness. He misrepresented Plato, and he almost caricatured the doctrines of Pythagoras. There is a canon of interpretation, which should guide us in our examinations of every philosophical opinion: ʺThe human mind has, under the necessary operation of its own laws, been compelled to entertain the same fundamental ideas, and the human heart to cherish the same feelings in all ages.ʺ It is certain that Pythagoras awakened the deepest intellectual sympathy of his age, and that his doctrines exerted a powerful influence upon the mind of Plato. His cardinal idea was that there existed a permanent principle of unity beneath the forms, changes, and other phenomena of the universe. Aristotle asserted that he taught that ʺnumbers are the first principles of all entities.ʺ Ritter has expressed the opinion that the formula of Pythagoras should be taken symbolically, which is doubtless correct. Aristotle goes on to associate these numbers with the ʺformsʺ and ʺideasʺ of Plato. He even declares that Plato said: ʺforms are numbers,ʺ and that ʺideas are substantial existences — real beings.ʺ Yet Plato did not so teach. He declared that the final cause was the Supreme Goodness — to ajgaqovn. ʺIdeas are objects of pure conception for the human reason, and they are

attributes of the Divine Reason.ʺ* Nor did he ever say that ʺforms are numbers.ʺ What he did say may be found in the Timæus: ʺGod formed things as they first arose according to forms and numbers.ʺ

It is recognized by modern science that all the higher laws of nature assume the form of quantitative statement. This is perhaps a fuller elaboration or more explicit affirmation of the Pythagorean doctrine. Numbers were regarded as the best representations of the laws of harmony which pervade the cosmos. We know too that in chemistry the doctrine of atoms and the laws of combination are actually and, as it were, arbitrarily defined by numbers. As Mr. W. Archer Butler has expressed it: ʺThe world is, then, through all its departments, a living arithmetic in its development, a realized geometry in its repose.ʺ

The key to the Pythagorean dogmas is the general formula of unity in multiplicity, the one evolving the many and pervading the many. This is the ancient doctrine of emanation in few words. Even the apostle Paul accepted it as true. ʺ Ex autouÆ, kai dij autouʹ, kai eiʺ auto;n ta; paÆnta ʺ — Out of him and through him and in him all things are. This, as we can see by the following quotation, is purely Hindu and Brahmanical:

ʺWhen the dissolution — Pralaya — had arrived at its term, the great Being — Para‐Atma or Para‐Purusha — the Lord existing through himself, out of whom and through

* Cousin, ʺHistory of Philosophy,ʺ I., ix.

xxiv

Isis Unveiled

whom all things were, and are and will be . . . resolved to emanate from his own substance the various creaturesʺ (Manava‐Dharma‐Sastra, book i., slokas 6 and 7).

The mystic Decad 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 = 10 is a way of expressing this idea. The One is God, the Two, matter; the Three, combining Monad and Duad, and partaking of the nature of both, is the phenomenal world; the Tetrad, or form of perfection, expresses the emptiness of all; and the Decad, or sum of all, involves the entire cosmos. The universe is the combination of a thousand elements, and yet the expression of a single spirit — a chaos to the sense, a cosmos to the reason.

The whole of this combination of the progression of numbers in the idea of creation is Hindu. The Being existing through himself, Swayambhu or Swayambhuva, as he is called by some, is one. He emanates from himself the creative faculty, Brahma or Purusha (the divine male), and the one becomes Two; out of this Duad, union of the purely intellectual principle with the principle of matter, evolves a third, which is Viradj, the phenomenal world. It is out of this invisible and incomprehensible trinity, the Brahmanic Trimurty, that evolves the second triad which represents the three faculties — the creative, the conservative, and the transforming. These are typified by Brahma, Vishnu, and Siva, but are again and ever blended into one. Unity, Brahma, or as the Vedas called him, Tridandi, is the god triply manifested, which gave rise to the symbolical Aum or the abbreviated Trimurty. It is but under this trinity, ever active

and tangible to all our senses, that the invisible and unknown Monas can manifest itself to the world of mortals. When he becomes Sarira, or he who puts on a visible form, he typifies all the principles of matter, all the germs of life, he is Purusha, the god of the three visages, or triple power, the essence of the Vedic triad. ʺLet the Brahmas know the sacred Syllable (Aum), the three words of the Savitri, and read the Vedas dailyʺ (Manu, book iv., sloka 125).

ʺAfter having produced the universe, He whose power is incomprehensible vanished again, absorbed in the Supreme Soul. . . . . Having retired into the primitive darkness, the great Soul remains within the unknown, and is void of all form. . . . .

ʺWhen having again reunited the subtile elementary principles, it introduces itself into either a vegetable or animal seed, it assumes at each a new form.ʺ

ʺIt is thus that, by an alternative waking and rest, the Immutable Being causes to revive and die eternally all the existing creatures, active and inertʺ (Manu, book i., sloka 50, and others).

He who has studied Pythagoras and his speculations on the Monad, which, after having emanated the Duad retires into silence and darkness, and thus creates the Triad can realize whence came the philosophy of the great Samian Sage, and after him that of Socrates and Plato.

Speusippus seems to have taught that the psychical or thumetic soul was immortal as well as the spirit or rational

xxv

Isis Unveiled

soul, and further on we will show his reasons. He also — like Philolaus and Aristotle, in his disquisitions upon the soul — makes of æther an element; so that there were five principal elements to correspond with the five regular figures in Geometry. This became also a doctrine of the Alexandrian school.* Indeed, there was much in the doctrines of the Philaletheans which did not appear in the works of the older Platonists, but was doubtless taught in substance by the philosopher himself, but with his usual reticence was not committed to writing as being too arcane for promiscuous publication. Speusippus and Xenocrates after him, held, like their great master, that the anima mundi, or world‐soul, was not the Deity, but a manifestation. Those philosophers never conceived of the One as an animate nature.† The original One did not exist, as we understand the term. Not till he had united with the many — emanated existence (the monad and duad) was a being produced. The tivmion , honored — the something manifested, dwells in the centre as in the circumference, but it is only the reflection of the Deity — the World‐Soul.‡ In this doctrine we find the spirit of esoteric Buddhism.

A manʹs idea of God, is that image of blinding light that he sees reflected in the concave mirror of his own soul, and yet this is not, in very truth, God, but only His reflection. His glory is there, but, it is the light of his own Spirit that the man

* ʺTheol. Arithme.,ʺ p. 62, ʺOn Pythag. Numbers.ʺ
† Plato, ʺParmenid.,ʺ 141 E.

‡ See Stobœusʹ ʺEcl.,ʺ i., 862.

sees, and it is all he can bear to look upon. The clearer the mirror, the brighter will be the divine image. But the external world cannot be witnessed in it at the same moment. In the ecstatic Yogin, in the illuminated Seer, the spirit will shine like the noonday sun; in the debased victim of earthly attraction, the radiance has disappeared, for the mirror is obscured with the stains of matter. Such men deny their God, and would willingly deprive humanity of soul at one blow.

No GOD, No SOUL? Dreadful, annihilating thought! The maddening nightmare of a lunatic — Atheist; presenting before his fevered vision, a hideous, ceaseless procession of sparks of cosmic matter created by no one; self‐appearing, self‐ existent, and self‐developing; this Self no Self, for it is nothing and nobody; floating onward from nowhence, it is propelled by no Cause, for there is none, and it rushes nowhither. And this in a circle of Eternity blind, inert, and — CAUSELESS. What is even the erroneous conception of the Buddhistic Nirvana in comparison! The Nirvana is preceded by numberless spiritual transformations and metempsychoses, during which the entity loses not for a second the sense of its own individuality, and which may last for millions of ages before the Final No‐Thing is reached.

Though some have considered Speusippus as inferior to Aristotle, the world is nevertheless indebted to him for defining and expounding many things that Plato had left obscure in his doctrine of the Sensible and Ideal. His maxim

xxvi

Isis Unveiled

was ʺThe Immaterial is known by means of scientific thought, the Material by scientific perception.ʺ*

Xenocrates expounded many of the unwritten theories and teachings of his master. He too held the Pythagorean doctrine, and his system of numerals and mathematics in the highest estimation. Recognizing but three degrees of knowledge—Thought, Perception, and Envisagement (or knowledge by Intuition), he made the former busy itself with all that which is beyond the heavens; Perception with things in the heavens; Intuition with the heavens themselves.

We find again these theories, and nearly in the same language in the Manava‐Dharma‐Sastra, when speaking of the creation of man: ʺHe (the Supreme) drew from his own essence the immortal breath which perisheth not in the being, and to this soul of the being he gave the Ahancara (conscience of the ego) sovereign guide.ʺ Then he gave to that soul of the being (man) the intellect formed of the three qualities, and the five organs of the outward perception.ʺ

These three qualities are Intelligence, Conscience, and Will; answering to the Thought, Perception, and Envisagement of Xenocrates. The relation of numbers to Ideas was developed by him further than by Speusippus, and he surpassed Plato in his definition of the doctrine of Indivisible Magnitudes. Reducing them to their ideal primary elements, he demonstrated that every figure and form originated out of the smallest indivisible line. That Xenocrates held the same

* Sextus, ʺMath.,ʺ vii.

theories as Plato in relation to the human soul (supposed to be a number) is evident, though Aristotle contradicts this, like every other teaching of this philosopher.† This is conclusive evidence that many of Platoʹs doctrines were delivered orally, even were it shown that Xenocrates and not Plato was the first to originate the theory of indivisible magnitudes. He derives the Soul from the first Duad, and calls it a self‐moved number.‡ Theophrastus remarks that he entered and eliminated this Soul‐theory more than any other Platonist. He built upon it the cosmological doctrine, and proved the necessary existence in every part of the universal space of a successive and progressive series of animated and thinking though spiritual beings.§ The Human Soul with him is a compound of the most spiritual properties of the Monad and the Duad, possessing the highest principles of both. If, like Plato and Prodicus, he refers to the Elements as to Divine Powers, and calls them gods, neither himself nor others connected any anthropomorphic idea with the appellation. Krische remarks that he called them gods only that these elementary powers should not be confounded with the dæmons of the nether world** (the Elementary Spirits). As the Soul of the World permeates the whole Cosmos, even beasts must have in them something divine.†† This, also, is

† ʺMetaph.,ʺ 407, a. 3.

‡ Appendix to ʺTimæus.ʺ
§ Stob., ʺEcl.,ʺ i., 62.

** Krische, ʺForsch.,ʺ p. 322, etc. †† Clem., ʺAlex. Stro.,ʺ v., 590.

xxvii

Isis Unveiled

the doctrine of Buddhists and the Hermetists, and Manu endows with a living soul even the plants and the tiniest blade of grass. —

The dæmons, according to this theory, are intermediate beings between the divine perfection and human sinfulness,* and he divides them into classes, each subdivided in many others. But he states expressly that the individual or personal soul is the leading guardian dæmon of every man, and that no dæmon has more power over us than our own. Thus the Daimonion of Socrates is the god or Divine Entity which inspired him all his life. It depends on man either to open or close his perceptions to the Divine voice. Like Speusippus he ascribed immortality to the fuch, psychical body, or irrational soul. But some Hermetic philosophers have taught that the soul has a separate continued existence only so long as in its passage through the spheres any material or earthly particles remain incorporated in it; and that when absolutely purified, the latter are annihilated, and the quintessence of the soul alone becomes blended with its divine spirit (the Rational), and the two are thenceforth one.

Zeller states that Xenocrates forbade the eating of animal food, not because he saw in beasts something akin to man, as he ascribed to them a dim consciousness of God, but, ʺfor the opposite reason, lest the irrationality of animal souls might

* Plutarch, ʺDe Isid,ʺ chap. 25, p. 360.

thereby obtain a certain influence over us.ʺ† But we believe that it was rather because, like Pythagoras, he had had the Hindu sages for his masters and models. Cicero depicted Xenocrates utterly despising everything except the highest virtue;‡ and describes the stainlessness and severe austerity of his character.§ ʺTo free ourselves from the subjection of sensuous existence, to conquer the Titanic elements in our terrestrial nature through the Divine one, is our problem.ʺ Zeller makes him say:** ʺPurity, even in the secret longings of our heart, is the greatest duty, and only philosophy and the initiation into the Mysteries help toward the attainment of this object.ʺ

Crantor, another philosopher associated with the earliest days of Platoʹs Academy, conceived the human soul as formed out of the primary substance of all things, the Monad or One, and the Duad or the Two. Plutarch speaks at length of this philosopher, who like his master believed in souls being distributed in earthly bodies as an exile and punishment.

Herakleides, though some critics do not believe him to have strictly adhered to Platoʹs primal philosophy,†† taught the same ethics. Zeller presents him to us imparting, like Hiçetas and Eçphantus, the Pythagorean doctrine of the diurnal rotation of the earth and the immobility of the fixed

† ʺPlato und die Alt. Akademie.ʺ
‡ ʺTusc.,ʺ v., 18, 51.
§ Ibid. Cf. p. 559.

** ʺPlato und die Alt. Akademie.ʺ †† Ed. Zeller, ʺPhilos. der Griech.ʺ

xxviii

Isis Unveiled

stars, but adds that he was ignorant of the annual revolution of the earth around the sun, and of the heliocentric system.* But we have good evidence that the latter system was taught in the Mysteries, and that Socrates died for atheism, i.e., for divulging this sacred knowledge. Herakleides adopted fully the Pythagorean and Platonic views of the human soul, its faculties and its capabilities. He describes it as a luminous, highly ethereal essence. He affirms that souls inhabit the milky way before descending ʺinto generationʺ or sublunary existence. His dæmons or spirits are airy and vaporous bodies.

In the Epinomis is fully stated the doctrine of the Pythagorean numbers in relation to created things. As a true Platonist, its author maintains that wisdom can only be attained by a thorough inquiry into the occult nature of the creation; it alone assures us an existence of bliss after death. The immortality of the soul is greatly speculated upon in this treatise; but its author adds that we can attain to this knowledge only through a complete comprehension of the numbers; for the man, unable to distinguish the straight line from a curved one will never have wisdom enough to secure a mathematical demonstration of the invisible, i.e., we must assure ourselves of the objective existence of our soul (astral body) before we learn that we are in possession of a divine and immortal spirit. Iamblichus says the same thing; adding, moreover, that it is a secret belonging to the highest initiation.

The Divine Power, he says, always felt indignant with those ʺwho rendered manifest the composition of the icostagonus,ʺ viz., who delivered the method of inscribing in a sphere the dodecahedron.†

The idea that ʺnumbersʺ possessing the greatest virtue, produce always what is good and never what is evil, refers to justice, equanimity of temper, and everything that is harmonious. When the author speaks of every star as an individual soul, he only means what the Hindu initiates and the Hermetists taught before and after him, viz.: that every star is an independent planet, which, like our earth, has a soul of its own, every atom of matter being impregnated with the divine influx of the soul of the world. It breathes and lives; it feels and suffers as well as enjoys life in its way. What naturalist is prepared to dispute it on good evidence? Therefore, we must consider the celestial bodies as the images of gods; as partaking of the divine powers in their substance; and though they are not immortal in their soul‐entity, their agency in the economy of the universe is entitled to divine honors, such as we pay to minor gods. The idea is plain, and one must be malevolent indeed to misrepresent it. If the author of Epinomis places these fiery gods higher than the animals, plants, and even mankind, all of which, as earthly creatures, are assigned by him a lower place, who can prove him wholly wrong? One must needs go deep indeed into the profundity of the abstract metaphysics of the old

* ʺPlato und die Alt. Akademie.ʺ † One of the five solid figures in Geometry.

xxix

Isis Unveiled

philosophies, who would understand that their various embodiments of their conceptions are, after all, based upon an identical apprehension of the nature of the First Cause, its attributes and method.

Again when the author of Epinomis locates between these highest and lowest gods (embodied souls) three classes of dæmons, and peoples the universe with invisible beings, he is more rational than our modern scientists, who make between the two extremes one vast hiatus of being, the playground of blind forces. Of these three classes the first two are invisible; their bodies are pure ether and fire (planetary spirits); the dæmons of the third class are clothed with vapory bodies; they are usually invisible, but sometimes making themselves concrete become visible for a few seconds. These are the earthly spirits, or our astral souls.

It is these doctrines, which, studied analogically, and on the principle of correspondence, led the ancient, and may now lead the modern Philaletheian step by step toward the solution of the greatest mysteries. On the brink of the dark chasm separating the spiritual from the physical world stands modern science, with eyes closed and head averted, pronouncing the gulf impassable and bottomless, though she holds in her hand a torch which she need only lower into the depths to show her her mistake. But across this chasm, the patient student of Hermetic philosophy has constructed a bridge.

In his Fragments of Science Tyndall makes the following sad confession: ʺIf you ask me whether science has solved, or is

likely in our day to solve the problem of this universe, I must shake my head in doubt.ʺ If moved by an afterthought, he corrects himself later, and assures his audience that experimental evidence has helped him to discover, in the opprobrium‐covered matter, the ʺpromise and potency of every quality of life,ʺ he only jokes. It would be as difficult for Professor Tyndall to offer any ultimate and irrefutable proofs of what he asserts, as it was for Job to insert a hook into the nose of the leviathan.

To avoid confusion that might easily arise by the frequent employment of certain terms in a sense different from that familiar to the reader, a few explanations will be timely. We desire to leave no pretext either for misunderstanding or misrepresentation. Magic may have one signification to one class of readers and another to another class. We shall give it the meaning which it has in the minds of its Oriental students and practitioners. And so with the words Hermetic Science, Occultism, Hierophant, Adept, Sorcerer, etc.; there has been little agreement of late as to their meaning. Though the distinctions between the terms are very often insignificant — merely ethnic — still, it may be useful to the general reader to know just what that is. We give a few alphabetically.

ÆTHROBACY, is the Greek name for walking or being lifted in the air; levitation, so called, among modern spiritualists. It may be either conscious or unconscious; in the one case, it is magic; in the other, either disease or a power which requires a few words of elucidation.

xxx

Isis Unveiled

A SYRIAC MANUSCRIPT ON SIMON MAGUS

A symbolical explanation of æthrobacy is given in an old Syriac manuscript which was translated in the fifteenth century by one Malchus, an alchemist. In connection with the case of Simon Magus, one passage reads thus:

ʺSimon, laying his face upon the ground, whispered in her ear, ʹO mother Earth, give me, I pray thee, some of thy breath; and I will give thee mine; let me loose, O mother, that I may carry thy words to the stars, and I will return faithfully to thee after a while.ʹ And the Earth strengthening her status, none to her detriment, sent her genius to breathe of her breath on Simon, while he breathed on her; and the stars rejoiced to be visited by the mighty One.ʺ

The starting‐point here is the recognized electro‐chemical principle that bodies similarly electrified repel each other, while those differently electrified mutually attract. ʺThe most elementary knowledge of chemistry,ʺ says Professor Cooke, ʺshows that, while radicals of opposite natures combine most eagerly together, two metals, or two closely‐allied metalloids, show but little affinity for each other.ʺ

GLOSSARY OF TERMS USED IN THIS BOOK

The earth is a magnetic body; in fact, as some scientists have found, it is one vast magnet, as Paracelsus affirmed some 300 years ago. It is charged with one form of electricity

— let us call it positive — which it evolves continuously by

spontaneous action, in its interior or centre of motion. Human bodies, in common with all other forms of matter, are charged with the opposite form of electricity — negative. That is to say, organic or inorganic bodies, if left to themselves will constantly and involuntarily charge themselves with, and evolve the form of electricity opposed to that of the earth itself. Now, what is weight? Simply the attraction of the earth. ʺWithout the attractions of the earth you would have no weight,ʺ says Professor Stewart;* ʺand if you had an earth twice as heavy as this, you would have double the attraction.ʺ How then, can we get rid of this attraction? According to the electrical law above stated, there is an attraction between our planet and the organisms upon it, which holds them upon the surface of the ground. But the law of gravitation has been counteracted in many instances, by levitations of persons and inanimate objects; how account for this? The condition of our physical systems, say theurgic philosophers, is largely dependent upon the action of our will. If well‐regulated, it can produce ʺmiraclesʺ; among others a change of this electrical polarity from negative to positive; the manʹs relations with the earth‐magnet would then become repellent, and ʺgravityʺ for him would have ceased to exist. It would then be as natural for him to rush into the air until the repellent force had exhausted itself, as, before, it had been for him to remain upon the ground. The altitude of his levitation would be measured by his ability, greater or less, to charge his body with positive electricity. This control over the

* ʺThe Sun and the Earth.ʺ

xxxi

Isis Unveiled

physical forces once obtained, alteration of his levity or gravity would be as easy as breathing.

The study of nervous diseases has established that even in ordinary somnambulism, as well as in mesmerized somnambulists, the weight of the body seems to be diminished. Professor Perty mentions a somnambulist, Koehler, who when in the water could not sink, but floated. The seeress of Prevorst rose to the surface of the bath and could not be kept seated in it. He speaks of Anna Fleisher, who being subject to epileptic fits, was often seen by the Superintendent to rise in the air; and was once, in the presence of two trustworthy witnesses (two deans) and others, raised two and a half yards from her bed in a horizontal position. The similar case of Margaret Rule is cited by Upham in his History of Salem Witchcraft. ʺIn ecstatic subjects,ʺ adds Professor Perty, ʺthe rising in the air occurs much more frequently than with somnambulists. We are so accustomed to consider gravitation as being a something absolute and unalterable, that the idea of a complete or partial rising in opposition to it seems inadmissible; nevertheless, there are phenomena in which, by means of material forces, gravitation is overcome. In several diseases — as, for instance, nervous fever — the weight of the human body seems to be increased, but in all ecstatic conditions to be diminished. And there may, likewise, be other forces than material ones which can counteract this power.ʺ

A Madrid journal, El Criterio Espiritista, of a recent date, reports the case of a young peasant girl near Santiago, which

possesses a peculiar interest in this connection. ʺTwo bars of magnetized iron held over her horizontally, half a metre distant, was sufficient to suspend her body in the air.ʺ

Were our physicians to experiment on such levitated subjects, it would be found that they are strongly charged with a similar form of electricity to that of the spot, which, according to the law of gravitation, ought to attract them, or rather prevent their levitation. And, if some physical nervous disorder, as well as spiritual ecstasy produce unconsciously to the subject the same effects, it proves that if this force in nature were properly studied, it could be regulated at will.

ALCHEMISTS — From Al and Chemi, fire, or the god and patriarch, Kham, also, the name of Egypt. The Rosicrucians of the middle ages, such as Robertus de Fluctibus (Robert Fludd), Paracelsus, Thomas Vaughan (Eugenius Philalethes), Van Helmont, and others, were all alchemists, who sought for the hidden spirit in every inorganic matter. Some people — nay, the great majority — have accused alchemists of charlatanry and false pretending. Surely such men as Roger Bacon, Agrippa, Henry Kunrath, and the Arabian Geber (the first to introduce into Europe some of the secrets of chemistry), can hardly be treated as impostors — least of all as fools. Scientists who are reforming the science of physics upon the basis of the atomic theory of Demokritus, as restated by John Dalton, conveniently forget that Demokritus, of Abdera, was an alchemist, and that the mind that was capable of penetrating so far into the secret operations of nature in one direction must have had good reasons to study and

xxxii

Isis Unveiled

become a Hermetic philosopher. Olaus Borrichias says, that the cradle of alchemy is to be sought in the most distant times.

ASTRAL LIGHT — The same as the sidereal light of Paracelsus and other Hermetic philosophers. Physically, it is the ether of modern science. Metaphysically, and in its spiritual, or occult sense, ether is a great deal more than is often imagined. In occult physics, and alchemy, it is well demonstrated to enclose within its shoreless waves not only Mr. Tyndallʹs ʺpromise and potency of every quality of life,ʺ but also the realization of the potency of every quality of spirit. Alchemists and Hermetists believe that their astral, or sidereal ether, besides the above properties of sulphur, and white and red magnesia, or magnes, is the anima mundi, the workshop of Nature and of all the cosmos, spiritually, as well as physically. The ʺgrand magisteriumʺ asserts itself in the phenomenon of mesmerism, in the ʺlevitationʺ of human and inert objects; and may be called the ether from its spiritual aspect.

The designation astral is ancient, and was used by some of the Neoplatonists. Porphyry describes the celestial body which is always joined with the soul as ʺimmortal, luminous, and star‐like.ʺ The root of this word may be found, perhaps, in the Scythic aistaer — which means star, or the Assyrian Istar, which, according to Burnouf has the same sense. As the Rosicrucians regarded the real, as the direct opposite of the apparent, and taught that what seems light to matter, is darkness to spirit, they searched for the latter in the astral

ocean of invisible fire which encompasses the world; and claim to have traced the equally invisible divine spirit, which overshadows every man and is erroneously called soul, to the very throne of the Invisible and Unknown God. As the great cause must always remain invisible and imponderable, they could prove their assertions merely by demonstration of its effects in this world of matter, by calling them forth from the unknowable down into the knowable universe of effects. That this astral light permeates the whole cosmos, lurking in its latent state even in the minutest particle of rock, they demonstrate by the phenomenon of the spark from flint and from every other stone, whose spirit when forcibly disturbed springs to sight spark‐like, and immediately disappears in the realms of the unknowable.

Paracelsus named it the sidereal light, taking the term from the Latin. He regarded the starry host (our earth included) as the condensed portions of the astral light which ʺfell down into generation and matter,ʺ but whose magnetic or spiritual emanations kept constantly a never‐ceasing intercommunication between themselves and the parent‐ fount of all — the astral light. ʺThe stars attract from us to themselves, and we again from them to us,ʺ he says. The body is wood and the life is fire, which comes like the light from the stars and from heaven. ʺMagic is the philosophy of alchemy,ʺ he says again.* Everything pertaining to the spiritual world must come to us through the stars, and if we

* ʺDe Ente Spirituali,ʺ lib. iv.; ʺde Ente Astrorum,ʺ book i.; and opera omnia,

vol. i., pp. 634 and 699.

xxxiii

Isis Unveiled

are in friendship with them, we may attain the greatest magical effects.

ʺAs fire passes through an iron stove, so do the stars pass through man with all their properties and go into him as the rain into the earth, which gives fruit out of that same rain. Now observe that the stars surround the whole earth, as a shell does the egg; through the shell comes the air, and penetrates to the centre of the world.ʺ The human body is subjected as well as the earth, and planets, and stars, to a double law; it attracts and repels, for it is saturated through with double magnetism, the influx of the astral light. Everything is double in nature; magnetism is positive and negative, active and passive, male and female. Night rests humanity from the dayʹs activity, and restores the equilibrium of human as well as of cosmic nature. When the mesmerizer will have learned the grand secret of polarizing the action and endowing his fluid with a bisexual force he will have become the greatest magician living. Thus the astral light is androgyne, for equilibrium is the resultant of two opposing forces eternally reacting upon each other. The result of this is LIFE. When the two forces are expanded and remain so long inactive, as to equal one another and so come to a complete rest, the condition is DEATH. A human being can blow either a hot or a cold breath; and can absorb either cold or hot air. Every child knows how to regulate the temperature of his breath; but how to protect oneʹs self from either hot or cold air, no physiologist has yet learned with certainty. The astral light alone, as the chief agent in magic, can discover to us all secrets of nature. The

astral light is identical with the Hindu akâsa, a word which we will now explain.

AKÂSA — Literally the word means in Sanscrit sky, but in its mystic sense it signifies the invisible sky; or, as the Brahmans term it in the Soma‐sacrifice (the Gyotishtoma Agnishtoma), the god Akâsa, or god Sky. The language of the Vedas shows that the Hindus of fifty centuries ago ascribed to it the same properties as do the Thibetan lamas of the present day; that they regarded it as the source of life, the reservoir of all energy, and the propeller of every change of matter. In its latent state it tallies exactly with our idea of the universal ether; in its active state it became the Akâsa, the all‐directing and omnipotent god. In the Brahmanical sacrificial mysteries it plays the part of Sadasya, or superintendent over the magical effects of the religious performance, and it had its own appointed Hotar (or priest), who took its name. In India, as in other countries in ancient times, the priests are the representatives on earth of different gods; each taking the name of the deity in whose name he acts.

The Akâsa is the indispensable agent of every Kritya (magical performance) either religious or profane. The Brahmanical expression ʺto stir up the Brahmaʺ —Brahma jinvati — means to stir up the power which lies latent at the bottom of every such magical operation, for the Vedic sacrifices are but ceremonial magic. This power is the Akâsa or the occult electricity; the alkahest of the alchemists in one sense, or the universal solvent, the same anima mundi as the astral light. At the moment of the sacrifice, the latter becomes

xxxiv

Isis Unveiled

imbued with the spirit of Brahma, and so for the time being is Brahma himself. This is the evident origin of the Christian dogma of transubstantiation. As to the most general effects of the Akâsa, the author of one of the most modern works on the occult philosophy, Art‐Magic, gives for the first time to the world a most intelligible and interesting explanation of the Akâsa in connection with the phenomena attributed to its influence by the fakirs and lamas.

ANTHROPOLOGY — The science of man; embracing among other things:

Physiology, or that branch of natural science which discloses the mysteries of the organs and their functions in men, animals, and plants; and also, and especially,

Psychology, or the great, and in our days, so neglected science of the soul, both as an entity distinct from the spirit and in its relations with the spirit and body. In modern science, psychology relates only or principally to conditions of the nervous system, and almost absolutely ignores the psychical essence and nature. Physicians denominate the science of insanity psychology, and name the lunatic chair in medical colleges by that designation.

CHALDEANS, or Kasdim — At first a tribe, then a caste of learned kabalists. They were the savants, the magians of Babylonia, astrologers and diviners. The famous Hillel, the precursor of Jesus in philosophy and in ethics, was a Chaldean. Franck in his Kabbala points to the close

resemblance of the ʺsecret doctrineʺ found in the Avesta and the religious metaphysics of the Chaldees.

DACTYLS (daktulos, a finger). — A name given to the priests attached to the worship of Kybelé (Cybelè). Some archæologists derive the name from davktuloʺ , finger, because they were ten, the same in number as the fingers of the hand. But we do not believe the latter hypothesis is the correct one.

DÆMONS — A name given by the ancient people, and especially the philosophers of the Alexandrian school, to all kinds of spirits, whether good or bad, human or otherwise. The appellation is often synonymous with that of gods or angels. But some philosophers tried, with good reason, to make a just distinction between the many classes.

DEMIURGOS, or Demiurge — Artificer; the Supernal Power which built the universe. Freemasons derive from this word their phrase of ʺSupreme Architect.ʺ The chief magistrates of certain Greek cities bore the title.

DERVISHES, or the ʺwhirling charmers,ʺ as they are called. Apart from the austerities of life, prayer and contemplation, the Mahometan devotee presents but little similarity with the Hindu fakir. The latter may become a sannyasi, or saint and holy mendicant; the former will never reach beyond his second class of occult manifestations. The dervish may also be a strong mesmerizer, but he will never voluntarily submit to the abominable and almost incredible self‐punishment which the fakir invents for himself with an ever‐increasing

xxxv

Isis Unveiled

avidity, until nature succumbs and he dies in slow and excruciating tortures. The most dreadful operations, such as flaying the limbs alive; cutting off the toes, feet, and legs; tearing out the eyes; and causing oneʹs self to be buried alive up to the chin in the earth, and passing whole months in this posture, seem childʹs play to them. One of the most common tortures is that of Tshiddy‐Parvady.* It consists in suspending the fakir to one of the mobile arms of a kind of gallows to be seen in the vicinity of many of the temples. At the end of each of these arms is fixed a pulley over which passes a rope terminated by an iron hook. This hook is inserted into the bare back of the fakir, who inundating the soil with blood is hoisted up in the air and then whirled round the gallows. From the first moment of this cruel operation until he is either unhooked or the flesh of his back tears out under the weight of the body and the fakir is hurled down on the heads of the crowd, not a muscle of his face will move. He remains calm and serious and as composed as if taking a refreshing bath. The fakir will laugh to scorn every imaginable torture, persuaded that the more his outer body is mortified, the brighter and holier becomes his inner, spiritual body. But the Dervish, neither in India, nor in other Mahometan lands, will ever submit to such operations.

DRUIDS — A sacerdotal caste which flourished in Britain and Gaul.

* Or more commonly chãrkh pũjã.

ELEMENTAL SPIRITS — The creatures evolved in the four kingdoms of earth, air, fire, and water, and called by the kabalists gnomes, sylphs, salamanders, and undines. They may be termed the forces of nature, and will either operate effects as the servile agents of general law, or may be employed by the disembodied spirits — whether pure or impure — and by living adepts of magic and sorcery, to produce desired phenomenal results. Such beings never become men.†

Under the general designation of fairies, and fays, these spirits of the elements appear in the myth, fable, tradition, or poetry of all nations, ancient and modern. Their names are legion — peris, devs, djins, sylvans, satyrs, fauns, elves, dwarfs, trolls, norns, nisses, kobolds, brownies, necks, stromkarls, undines, nixies, salamanders, goblins, ponkes, banshees, kelpies, pixies, moss people, good people, good neighbors, wild women, men of peace, white ladies — and many more. They have been seen, feared, blessed, banned,

† Persons who believe in the clairvoyant power, but are disposed to discredit the existence of any other spirits in nature than disembodied human spirits, will be interested in an account of certain clairvoyant observations which appeared in the London Spiritualist of June 29, 1877. A thunder‐storm approaching, the seeress saw ʺa bright spirit emerge from a dark cloud and pass with lightning speed across the sky, and, a few minutes after, a diagonal line of dark spirits in the clouds.ʺ These are the Maruts of the ʺVedasʺ (See Max Müllerʹs ʺRig‐Veda Sanhitaʺ).

The well‐known and respected lecturer, author, and clairvoyant, Mrs. Emma Hardinge Britten, has published accounts of her frequent experiences with these elemental spirits.

xxxvi

Isis Unveiled

and invoked in every quarter of the globe and in every age. Shall we then concede that all who have met them were hallucinated?

These elementals are the principal agents of disembodied but never visible spirits at seances, and the producers of all the phenomena except the subjective.

ELEMENTARY SPIRITS — Properly, the disembodied souls of the depraved; these souls having at some time prior to death separated from themselves their divine spirits, and so lost their chance for immortality. Eliphas Levi and some other kabalists make little distinction between elementary spirits who have been men, and those beings which people the elements, and are the blind forces of nature. Once divorced from their bodies, these souls (also called ʺastral bodiesʺ) of purely materialistic persons, are irresistibly attracted to the earth, where they live a temporary and finite life amid elements congenial to their gross natures. From having never, during their natural lives, cultivated their spirituality, but subordinated it to the material and gross, they are now unfitted for the lofty career of the pure, disembodied being, for whom the atmosphere of earth is stifling and mephitic, and whose attractions are all away from it. After a more or less prolonged period of time these material souls will bemgin to disintegrate, and finally, like a column of mist, be dissolved, atom by atom, in the surrounding elements.

ESSENES — from Asa, a healer. A sect of Jews said by Pliny to have lived near the Dead Sea ʺper millia sæculorumʺ — for thousands of ages. Some have supposed them to be extreme

Pharisees; and others — which may be the true theory — the descendants of the Benim‐nabim of the Bible, and think they were ʺKenitesʺ and ʺNazarites.ʺ They had many Buddhistic ideas and practices; and it is noteworthy that the priests of the Great Mother at Ephesus, Diana‐Bhavani with many breasts, were also so denominated. Eusebius, and after him De Quincey, declared them to be the same as the early Christians, which is more than probable. The title ʺbrother,ʺ used in the early Church, was Essenean: they were a fraternity, or a koinobion or community like the early converts. It is noticeable that only the Sadducees, or Zadokites, the priest‐caste and their partisans, persecuted the Christians; the Pharisees were generally scholastic and mild, and often sided with the latter. James the Just was a Pharisee till his death; but Paul or Aher was esteemed a schismatic.

EVOLUTION — The development of higher orders of animals from the lower. Modern, or so‐called exact science, holds but to a one‐sided physical evolution, prudently avoiding and ignoring the higher or spiritual evolution, which would force our contemporaries to confess the superiority of the ancient philosophers and psychologists over themselves. The ancient sages, ascending to the UNKNOWABLE, made their starting‐point from the first manifestation of the unseen, the unavoidable, and from a strict logical reasoning, the absolutely necessary creative Being, the Demiurgos of the universe. Evolution began with them from pure spirit, which descending lower and lower down, assumed at last a visible and comprehensible form,

xxxvii

Isis Unveiled

and became matter. Arrived at this point, they speculated in the Darwinian method, but on a far more large and comprehensive basis.

In the Rig‐Veda‐Sanhita, the oldest book of the World* (to which even our most prudent Indiologists and Sanscrit scholars assign an antiquity of between two and three thousand years B.C.), in the first book, ʺHymns to the Maruts,ʺ it is said:

ʺNot‐being and Being are in the highest heaven, in the birthplace of Daksha, in the lap of Aditiʺ (Mandala, i, Sukta 166).

ʺIn the first age of the gods, Being (the comprehensible Deity) was born from Not‐being (whom no intellect can comprehend); after it were born the Regions (the invisible), from them Uttânapada.ʺ

ʺFrom Uttânapad the Earth was born, the Regions (those that are visible) were born from the Earth. Daksha was born of Aditi, and Aditi from Dakshaʺ (Ibid.).

Aditi is the Infinite, and Daksha is dakska‐pitarah, literally meaning the father of gods, but understood by Max Müller and Roth to mean the fathers of strength, ʺpreserving, possessing, granting faculties.ʺ Therefore, it is easy to see that ʺDaksha, born of Aditi and Aditi from Daksha,ʺ means what the

* Translated by Max Müller, Professor of Comparative Philology at the Oxford University, England.

moderns understand by ʺcorrelation of forcesʺ; the more so as we find in this passage (translated by Prof. Müller):

ʺI place Agni, the source of all beings, the father of strengthʺ (iii., 27, 2), a clear and identical idea which prevailed so much in the doctrines of the Zoroastrians, the Magians, and the mediæval fire‐philosophers. Agni is god of fire, of the Spiritual Ether, the very substance of the divine essence of the Invisible God present in every atom of His creation and called by the Rosicrucians the ʺCelestial Fire.ʺ If we only carefully compare the verses from this Mandala, one of which runs thus: ʺThe Sky is your father, the Earth your mother, Soma your brother, Aditi your sisterʺ (i., 191, 6),† with the inscription on the Smaragdine Tablet of Hermes, we will find the same substratum of metaphysical philosophy, the identical doctrines!

ʺAs all things were produced by the mediation of one being, so all things were produced from this one thing by adaptation: ʹIts father is the sun; its mother is the moonʹ. . . .

etc. Separate the earth from the fire, the subtile from the gross. .

. . What I had to say about the operation of the sun is completedʺ (Smaragdine Tablet).‡

† ʺDyarih vah pitâ, prithivi mâtâ sômah bhrâtâ âditih svasâ.ʺ

‡ As the perfect identity of the philosophical and religious doctrines of antiquity will be fully treated upon in subsequent chapters, we limit our explanations for the present.

xxxviii

Isis Unveiled

Professor Max Müller sees in this Mandala ʺat last, something like a theogony, though full of contradictions.ʺ* The alchemists, kabalists, and students of mystic philosophy will find therein a perfectly defined system of Evolution in the Cosmogony of a people who lived a score of thousands of years before our era. They will find in it, moreover, a perfect identity of thought and even doctrine with the Hermetic philosophy, and also that of Pythagoras and Plato.

In Evolution, as it is now beginning to be understood, there is supposed to be in all matter an impulse to take on a higher form — a supposition clearly expressed by Manu and other Hindu philosophers of the highest antiquity. The philosopherʹs tree illustrates it in the case of the zinc solution. The controversy between the followers of this school and the Emanationists may be briefly stated thus: The Evolutionist stops all inquiry at the borders of ʺthe Unknowableʺ; the Emanationist believes that nothing can be evolved — or, as the word means, unwombed or born — except it has first been involved, thus indicating that life is from a spiritual potency above the whole.

FAKIRS — Religious devotees in East India. They are generally attached to Brahmanical pagodas and follow the laws of Manu. A strictly religious fakir will go absolutely naked, with the exception of a small piece of linen called dhoti, around his loins. They wear their hair long, and it serves them as a pocket, as they stick in it various objects —

* ʺRig‐Veda‐Anhita,ʺ p. 234.

such as a pipe, a small flute called vagudah, the sounds of which throw the serpents into a cataleptic torpor, and sometimes their bamboo‐stick (about one foot long) with the seven mystical knots on it. This magical stick, or rather rod, the fakir receives from his guru on the day of his initiation, together with the three mantrams, which are communicated to him ʺmouth to ear.ʺ No fakir will be seen without this powerful adjunct of his calling. It is, as they all claim, the divining rod, the cause of every occult phenomenon produced by them.† The Brahmanical fakir is entirely distinct from the Mussulman mendicant of India, also called fakirs in some parts of the British territory.

HERMETIST— From Hermes, the god of Wisdom, known in Egypt, Syria, and Phœnicia as Thoth, Tat, Adad, Seth, and Sat‐an (the latter not to be taken in the sense applied to it by Moslems and Christians), and in Greece as Kadmus. The kabalists identify him with Adam Kadmon, the first manifestation of the Divine Power, and with Enoch. There were two Hermes: the elder was the Trismegistus, and the second an emanation, or ʺpermutationʺ of himself; the friend

† Philostratus assures us that the Brahmins were able, in his time, to perform the most wonderful cures by merely pronouncing certain magical words. ʺThe Indian Brahmans carry a staff and a ring, by means of which they are able to do almost anything.ʺ Origenes states the same (ʺContra Celsumʺ). But if a strong mesmeric fluid — say projected from the eye, and without any other contact — is not added, no magical words would be efficacious.

xxxix

Isis Unveiled

and instructor of Isis and Osiris. Hermes is the god of the priestly wisdom, like Mazeus.

HIEROPHANT — Discloser of sacred learning. The Old Man, the Chief of the Adepts at the initiations, who explained the arcane knowledge to the neophytes, bore this title. In Hebrew and Chaldaic the term was Peter, or opener, discloser; hence, the Pope, as the successor of the hierophant of the ancient Mysteries, sits in the Pagan chair of ʺSt. Peter.ʺ The vindictiveness of the Catholic Church toward the alchemists, and to arcane and astronomical science, is explained by the fact that such knowledge was the ancient prerogative of the hierophant, or representative of Peter, who kept the mysteries of life and death. Men like Bruno, Galileo, and Kepler, therefore, and even Cagliostro, trespassed on the preserves of the Church, and were accordingly murdered.

Every nation had its Mysteries and hierophants. Even the Jews had their Peter — Tanaïm or Rabbin, like Hillel, Akiba,* and other famous kabalists, who alone could impart the awful knowledge contained in the Merkaba. In India, there was in ancient times one, and now there are several hierophants scattered about the country, attached to the principal pagodas, who are known as the Brahma‐âtmas. In Thibet the chief hierophant is the Dalay, or Taley‐Lama of

* Akiba was a friend of Aher, said to have been the Apostle Paul of Christian story. Both are depicted as having visited Paradise. Aher took branches from the Tree of Knowledge, and so fell from the true (Jewish) religion. Akiba came away in peace. See 2d Epistle to the Corinthians, chapter xii.

Lha‐ssa.† Among Christian nations, the Catholics alone have preserved this ʺheathenʺ custom, in the person of their Pope, albeit they have sadly disfigured its majesty and the dignity of the sacred office.

INITIATES — In times of antiquity, those who had been initiated into the arcane knowledge taught by the hierophants of the Mysteries; and in our modern days those who have been initiated by the adepts of mystic lore into the mysterious knowledge, which, notwithstanding the lapse of ages, has yet a few real votaries on earth.

KABALIST, from חלכק, KABALA; an unwritten or oral tradition. The kabalist is a student of ʺsecret science,ʺ one who interprets the hidden meaning of the Scriptures with the help of the symbolical Kabala, and explains the real one by these means. The Tanaim were the first kabalists among the Jews; they appeared at Jerusalem about the beginning of the third century before the Christian era. The Books of Ezekiel, Daniel, Henoch, and the Revelation of St. John, are purely kabalistical. This secret doctrine is identical with that of the Chaldeans, and includes at the same time much of the Persian wisdom, or ʺmagic.ʺ

LAMAS — Buddhist monks belonging to the Lamaic religion of Thibet, as, for instance, friars are the monks belonging to the Popish or Roman Catholic religion. Every lama is subject to the grand Taley‐Lama, the Buddhist pope of

† Taley means ocean or sea.

xl

Isis Unveiled

Thibet, who holds his residence at Lha‐ssa, and is a reincarnation of Buddha.

MAGE, or Magian; from Mag or Maha. The word is the root of the word magician. The Maha‐âtma (the great Soul or Spirit) in India had its priests in the pre‐Vedic times. The Magians were priests of the fire‐god; we find them among the Assyrians and Babylonians, as well as among the Persian fire‐ worshippers. The three magi, also denominated kings, that are said to have made gifts of gold, incense, and myrrh to the infant Jesus, were fire‐worshippers like the rest, and astrologers; for they saw his star. The high priest of the Parsis, at Surat, is called Mobed, others derived the word from Megh; Meh‐ab signifying something grand and noble. Zoroasterʹs disciples were called Meghestom, according to Kleuker.

MAGICIAN — This term, once a title of renown and distinction, has come to be wholly perverted from its true meaning. Once the synonym of all that was honorable and reverent, of a possessor of learning and wisdom, it has become degraded into an epithet to designate one who is a pretender and a juggler; a charlatan, in short, or one who has ʺsold his soul to the Evil Oneʺ; who misuses his knowledge, and employs it for low and dangerous uses, according to the teachings of the clergy, and a mass of superstitious fools who believe the magician a sorcerer and an enchanter. But Christians forget, apparently, that Moses was also a magician, and Daniel, ʺMaster of the magicians, astrologers, Chaldeans, and soothsayersʺ (Daniel, v. II).

The word magician then, scientifically speaking, is derived from Magh, Mah, Hindu or Sanscrit Maha — great; a man well versed in the secret or esoteric knowledge; properly a Sacerdote.

MANTICISM, or mantic frenzy. During this state was developed the gift of prophecy. The two words are nearly synonymous. One was as honored as the other. Pythagoras and Plato held it in high esteem, and Socrates advised his disciples to study Manticism. The Church Fathers, who condemned so severely the mantic frenzy in Pagan priests and Pythiæ, were not above applying it to their own uses. The Montanists, who took their name from Montanus, a bishop of Phrygia, who was considered divinely inspired, rivalled with the manteis or prophets. ʺTertullian, Augustine, and the martyrs of Carthage, were of the number,ʺ says the author of

Prophecy, Ancient and Modern. ʺThe Montanists seem to have resembled the Bacchantes in the wild enthusiasm that characterized their orgies,ʺ he adds. There is a diversity of opinion as to the origin of the word Manticism. There was the famous Mantis the Seer, in the days of Melampus and Prœtus, King of Argos; and there was Manto, the daughter of the prophet of Thebes, herself a prophetess. Cicero describes prophecy and mantic frenzy by saying that ʺin the inner recesses of the mind is divine prophecy hidden and confined, a divine impulse, which when it burns more vividly is called furorʺ (frenzy, madness).

But there is still another etymology possible for the word mantis, and to which we doubt if the attention of the

xli

Isis Unveiled

philologists was ever drawn. The mantic frenzy may, perchance, have a still earlier origin. The two sacrificial cups of the Soma‐mystery used during the religious rites, and generally known as grahas, are respectively called Sukra and
Manti.*

It is in the latter manti or manthi cup that Brahma is said to be ʺstirred up.ʺ While the initiate drinks (albeit sparingly) of this sacred soma‐juice, the Brahma, or rather his ʺspirit,ʺ personified by the god Soma, enters into the man and takes possession of him. Hence, ecstatic vision, clairvoyance, and the gift of prophecy. Both kinds of divination — the natural and the artificial — are aroused by the Soma. The Sukra‐cup awakens that which is given to every man by nature. It unites both spirit and soul, and these, from their own nature and essence, which are divine, have a foreknowledge of future things, as dreams, unexpected visions, and presentiments, well prove. The contents of the other cup, the manti, which ʺstirs the Brahma,ʺ put thereby the soul in communication not only with the minor gods — the well‐informed but not omniscient spirits — but actually with the highest divine essence itself. The soul receives a direct illumination from the presence of its ʺgodʺ; but as it is not allowed to remember certain things, well known only in heaven, the initiated person is generally seized with a kind of sacred frenzy, and upon recovering from it, only remembers that which is allowed to him. As to the other kind of seers and diviners —

* See ʺAytareya Brahmanan,ʺ 3, I.

those who make a profession of and a living by it — they are usually held to be possessed by a gandharva, a deity which is nowhere so little honored as in India.

MANTRA — A Sanskrit word conveying the same idea as the ʺIneffable Name.ʺ Some mantras, when pronounced according to magical formula taught in the Atharva‐Veda, produce an instantaneous and wonderful effect. In its general sense, though, a mantra is either simply a prayer to the gods and powers of heaven, as taught by the Brahmanical books, and especially Manu, or else a magical charm. In its esoteric sense, the ʺwordʺ of the mantra, or mystic speech, is called by the Brahmans Vâch. It resides in the mantra, which literally means those parts of the sacred books which are considered as the Sruti, or direct divine revelation.

MARABUT — A Mahometan pilgrim who has been to Mekka; a saint, after whose death his body is placed in an open sepulchre built on the surface, like other buildings, but in the middle of the streets and public places of populated cities. Placed inside the small and only room of the tomb (and several such public sarcophagi of brick and mortar may be seen to this day in the streets and squares of Cairo), the devotion of the wayfarers keeps a lamp ever burning at his head. The tombs of some of these marabuts have a great fame for the miracles they are alleged to perform.

MATERIALIZATION — A word employed by spiritualists to indicate the phenomenon of ʺa spirit clothing himself with a material form.ʺ The far less objectionable term, ʺform‐ manifestation,ʺ has been recently suggested by Mr. Stainton‐

xlii

Isis Unveiled

Moses, of London. When the real nature of these apparitions is better comprehended, a still more appropriate name will doubtless be adopted. To call them materialized spirits is inadmissible, for they are not spirits but animated portrait‐ statues.

MAZDEANS, from (Ahura) Mazda. (See Spiegelʹs Yasna, xl.) They were the ancient Persian nobles who worshipped Ormazd, and, rejecting images, inspired the Jews with the same horror for every concrete representation of the Deity. ʺThey seem in Herodotusʹs time to have been superseded by the Magian religionists. The Parsis and Ghebers geberim, mighty men, of Genesis vi. and x. 8) appear to be Magian religionists. . . . By a curious muddling of ideas, Zoro‐Aster (Zero, a circle, a son or priest, Aster, Ishtar, or Astarte — in Aryan dialect, a star), the title of the head of the Magians and fire‐worshippers, or Surya‐ishtara, the sun‐worshipper, is often confounded in modern times with Zara‐tustra, the reputed Mazdean apostleʺ (Zoroaster).

METEMPSYCHOSIS — The progress of the soul from one stage of existence to another. Symbolized and vulgarly believed to be rebirths in animal bodies. A term generally misunderstood by every class of European and American society, including many scientists. The kabalistic axiom, ʺA stone becomes a plant, a plant an animal, an animal a man, a man a spirit, and a spirit a god,ʺ receives an explanation in Manuʹs Manava‐Dharma‐Sastra, and other Brahmanical books.

MYSTERIES — Greek teletai, or finishings, as analogous to teleuteia or death. They were observances, generally kept

secret from the profane and uninitiated, in which were taught by dramatic representation and other methods, the origin of things, the nature of the human spirit, its relations to the body, and the method of its purification and restoration to higher life. Physical science, medicine, the laws of music, divination, were all taught in the same manner. The Hippocratic oath was but a mystic obligation. Hippocrates was a priest of Asklepios, some of whose writings chanced to become public. But the Asklepiades were initiates of the Æsculapian serpent‐worship, as the Bacchantes were of the Dionysia; and both rites were eventually incorporated with the Eleusinia. We will treat of the Mysteries fully in the subsequent chapters.

MYSTICS — Those initiated. But in the mediæval and later periods the term was applied to men like Bœhmén the Theosophist, Molinos the Quietist, Nicholas of Basle, and others who believed in a direct interior communion with God, analogous to the inspiration of the prophets.

NABIA — Seership, soothsaying. This oldest and most respected of mystic phenomena, is the name given to prophecy in the Bible, and is correctly included among the spiritual powers, such as divination, clairvoyant visions, trance‐conditions, and oracles. But while enchanters, diviners, and even astrologers are strictly condemned in the Mosaic books, prophecy, seership, and nabia appear as the special gifts of heaven. In early ages they were all termed Epoptai, the Greek word for seers, clairvoyants; after which they were designated as Nebim, ʺthe plural of Nebo, the Babylonian god

xliii

Isis Unveiled

of wisdom.ʺ The kabalist distinguishes between the seer and the magician; one is passive, the other active; Nebirah, is one who looks into futurity and a clairvoyant; Nebi‐poel, he who possesses magic powers. We notice that Elijah and Apollonius resorted to the same means to isolate themselves from the disturbing influences of the outer world, viz.: wrapping their heads entirely in a woolen mantle; from its being an electric non‐conductor we must suppose.

OCCULTIST — One who studies the various branches of occult science. The term is used by the French kabalists (See Eliphas Leviʹs works). Occultism embraces the whole range of psychological, physiological, cosmical, physical, and spiritual phenomena. From the word occult, hidden or secret; applying therefore to the study of the Kabala, astrology, alchemy, and all arcane sciences.

PAGAN GODS — This term gods is erroneously understood by most of the reading public, to mean idols. The idea attached to them is not that of something objective or anthropomorphical. With the exception of occasions when ʺgodsʺ mean either divine planetary entities (angels), or disembodied spirits of pure men, the term simply conveys to the mind of the mystic — whether Hindu Hotar, Mazdean Mage, Egyptian hierophant, or disciple of the Greek philosophers — the idea of a visible or cognized manifestation of an invisible potency of nature. And such occult potencies are invoked under the appellation of various gods, who, for the time being, are personating these powers. Thus every one of the numberless deities of the Hindu,

Greek, and Egyptian Pantheons, are simply Powers of the ʺUnseen Universe.ʺ When the officiating Brahman invokes Aditya — who, in her cosmic character, is the goddess‐sun — he simply commands that potency (personified in some god), which, as he asserts, ʺresides in the Mantra, as the sacred Vâch.ʺ These god‐powers are allegorically regarded as the divine Hotars of the Supreme One; while the priest (Brahman) is the human Hotar who officiates on earth, and representing that particular Power becomes, ambassador‐like, invested with the very potency which he personates.

PITRIS — It is generally believed that the Hindu term Pitris means the spirits of our direct ancestors; of disembodied people. Hence the argument of some spiritualists that fakirs, and other Eastern wonder‐workers, are mediums; that they themselves confess to being unable to produce anything without the help of the Pitris, of whom they are the obedient instruments. This is in more than one sense erroneous. The Pitris are not the ancestors of the present living men, but those of the human kind or Adamic race; the spirits of human races which, on the great scale of descending evolution, preceded our races of men, and were physically, as well as spiritually, far superior to our modern pigmies. In Manava‐ Dharma‐Sastra they are called the Lunar ancestors.

PYTHIA, or Pythoness. — Webster dismisses the word very briefly by saying that it was the name of one who delivered the oracles at the Temple of Delphi, and ʺany female supposed to have the spirit of divination in her — a witch,ʺ which is neither complimentary, exact, nor just. A Pythia,

xliv

Isis Unveiled

upon the authority of Plutarch, Iamblichus, Lamprias, and others, was a nervous sensitive; she was chosen from among the poorest class, young and pure. Attached to the temple, within whose precincts she had a room, secluded from every other, and to which no one but the priest, or seer, had admittance, she had no communications with the outside world, and her life was more strict and ascetic than that of a Catholic nun. Sitting on a tripod of brass placed over a fissure in the ground, through which arose intoxicating vapors, these subterranean exhalations penetrating her whole system produced the prophetic mania. In this abnormal state she delivered oracles. She was sometimes called ventriloqua vates,* the ventriloquist‐prophetess.

The ancients placed the astral soul of man, fuch , or his self‐consciousness, in the pit of the stomach. The Brahmans shared this belief with Plato and other philosophers. Thus we find in the fourth verse of the second Nabhânedishtha Hymn it is said: ʺHear, O sons of the gods (spirits) one who speaks through his navel (nâbhâ) for he hails you in your dwellings!ʺ

Many of the Sanscrit scholars agree that this belief is one of the most ancient among the Hindus. The modern fakirs, as well as the ancient gymnosophists, unite themselves with their Âtman and the Deity by remaining motionless in contemplation and concentrating their whole thought on their navel. As in modern somnambulic phenomena, the navel was regarded as ʺthe circle of the sun,ʺ the seat of internal divine

* See Pantheon, ʺMyths,ʺ p. 31; also Aristophanes in ʺVœstas,ʺ i., reg. 28.

light.† Is the fact of a number of modern somnambulists being enabled to read letters, hear, smell, and see, through that part of their body to be regarded again as a simple ʺcoincidence,ʺ or shall we admit at last that the old sages knew something more of physiological and psychological mysteries than our modern Academicians? In modern Persia, when a ʺmagicianʺ (often simply a mesmerizer) is consulted upon occasions of theft and other puzzling occurrences, he makes his manipulations over the pit of his stomach, and so brings himself into a state of clairvoyance. Among the modern Parsis, remarks a translator of the Rig‐vedas, there exists a belief up to the present day that their adepts have a flame in their navel, which enlightens to them all darkness and discloses the spiritual world, as well as all things unseen, or at a distance. They call it the lamp of the Deshtur, or high priest; the light of the Dikshita (the initiate), and otherwise designate it by many other names.

SAMOTHRACES — A designation of the Fane‐gods worshipped at Samothracia in the Mysteries. They are considered as identical with the Kabeiri, Dioskuri, and Korybantes. Their names were mystical — denoting Pluto, Ceres or Proserpina, Bacchus, and Æsculapius or Hermes.

† The oracle of Apollo was at Delphos, the city of the “delfu,ʺ womb or abdomen; the place of the temple was denominated the omphalos or navel. The symbols are female and lunary; reminding us that the Arcadians were called Proseleni, pre‐Hellenic or more ancient than the period when Ionian and Olympian lunar worship was introduced.

xlv

Isis Unveiled

SHAMANS, or Samaneans. — An order of Buddhists among the Tartars, especially those of Siberia. They are possibly akin to the philosophers anciently known as Brachmanes, mistaken sometimes for Brahmans.* They are all magicians, or rather sensitives or mediums artificially developed. At present those who act as priests among the Tartars are generally very ignorant, and far below the fakirs in knowledge and education. Both men and women may be Shamans.

SOMA— This Hindu sacred beverage answers to the Greek ambrosia or nectar, drunk by the gods of Olympus. A cup of kykeon was also quaffed by the mysta at the Eleusinian initiation. He who drinks it easily reaches Bradhna, or place of splendor (Heaven). The soma‐drink known to Europeans is not the genuine beverage, but its substitute; for the initiated priests alone can taste of the real soma; and even kings and rajas, when sacrificing, receive the substitute. Haug shows by his own confession, in his Aytareya Brahmanan, that it was not the Soma that he tasted and found nasty, but the juice from the roots of the Nyagradha, a plant or bush which grows on the hills of Poona. We were positively informed that the majority of the sacrificial priests of the Dekkan have lost the

* From the accounts of Strabo and Megasthenes, who visited Palibothras, it would seem that the persons termed by him Samanean, or Brachmane priests, were simply Buddhists. ʺThe singularly subtile replies of the Samanean or Brahman philosophers, in their interview with the conqueror, will be found to contain the spirit of the Buddhist doctrine,ʺ remarks Upham. (See the ʺHistory and Doctrine of Buddhismʺ; and Haleʹs ʺChronology,ʺ vol. iii, p. 238.)

secret of the true soma. It can be found neither in the ritual books nor through oral information. The true followers of the primitive Vedic religion are very few; these are the alleged descendants from the Rishis, the real Agnihôtris, the initiates of the great Mysteries. The soma‐drink is also commemorated in the Hindu Pantheon, for it is called the King‐Soma. He who drinks of it is made to participate in the heavenly king, because he becomes filled with it, as the Christian apostles and their converts became filled with the Holy Ghost, and purified of their sins. The soma makes a new man of the initiate; he is reborn and transformed, and his spiritual nature overcomes the physical; it gives the divine power of inspiration, and develops the clairvoyant faculty to the utmost. According to the exoteric explanation the soma is a plant, but, at the same time it is an angel. It forcibly connects the inner, highest ʺspiritʺ of man, which spirit is an angel like the mystical soma, with his ʺirrational soul,ʺ or astral body, and thus united by the power of the magic drink, they soar together above physical nature, and participate during life in the beatitude and ineffable glories of Heaven.

Thus the Hindu soma is mystically, and in all respects the same that the Eucharistic supper is to the Christian. The idea is similar. By means of the sacrificial prayers — the mantras

— this liquor is supposed to be transformed on the spot into real soma— — or the angel, and even into Brahma himself. Some missionaries have expressed themselves very indignantly about this ceremony, the more so, that, generally speaking, the Brahmans use a kind of spirituous liquor as a

xlvi

Isis Unveiled

substitute. But do the Christians believe less fervently in the transubstantiation of the communion‐wine into the blood of Christ, because this wine happens to be more or less spirituous? Is not the idea of the symbol attached to it the same? But the missionaries say that this hour of soma‐ drinking is the golden hour of Satan, who lurks at the bottom of the Hindu sacrificial cup.*

SPIRIT — The lack of any mutual agreement between writers in the use of this word has resulted in dire confusion. It is commonly made synonymous with soul; and the lexicographers countenance the usage. This is the natural result of our ignorance of the other word, and repudiation of the classification adopted by the ancients. Elsewhere we attempt to make clear the distinction between the terms ʺspiritʺ and ʺsoul.ʺ There are no more important passages in this work. Meanwhile, we will only add that ʺspiritʺ is the νοῦς of Plato, the immortal, immaterial, and purely divine principle in man — the crown of the human Triad; whereas,

SOUL is the ψυχη, or the nephesh of the Bible; the vital principle, or the breath of life, which every animal, down to the infusoria, shares with man. In the translated Bible it stands indifferently for life, blood, and soul. ʺLet us not kill his

* In their turn, the heathen may well ask the missionaries what sort of a spirit lurks at the bottom of the sacrificial beer‐bottle. That evangelical New York journal, the ʺIndependent,ʺ says: ʺA late English traveller found a simple‐minded Baptist mission church, in far‐off Burmah, using for the communion service, and we doubt not with Godʹs blessing, Bassʹs pale ale instead of wine.ʺ Circumstances alter cases, it seems!

nephesh,ʺ says the original text: ʺlet us not kill him,ʺ translate the Christians (Genesis xxxvii. 21), and so on.

THEOSOPHISTS— In the mediæval ages it was the name by which were known the disciples of Paracelsus of the sixteenth century, the so‐called fire‐philosophers or Philosophi per ignem. As well as the Platonists they regarded the soul, (ψυχη), and the divine spirit, nous (νοῦς), as a particle of the great Archos — a fire taken from the eternal ocean of light.

The Theosophical Society, to which these volumes are dedicated by the author as a mark of affectionate regard, was organized at New York in 1875. The object of its founders was to experiment practically in the occult powers of Nature, and to collect and disseminate among Christians information about the Oriental religious philosophies. Later, it has determined to spread among the ʺpoor benighted heathenʺ such evidences as to the practical results of Christianity as will at least give both sides of the story to the communities among which missionaries are at work. With this view it has established relations with associations and individuals throughout the East, to whom it furnishes authenticated reports of the ecclesiastical crimes and misdemeanors, schisms and heresies, controversies and litigations, doctrinal differences and biblical criticisms and revisions, with which the press of Christian Europe and America constantly teems. Christendom has been long and minutely informed of the degradation and brutishness into which Buddhism, Brahmanism, and Confucianism have plunged their deluded votaries, and many millions have been lavished upon foreign

xlvii

Isis Unveiled

missions under such false representations. The Theosophical Society, seeing daily exemplifications of this very state of things as the sequence of Christian teaching and example — the latter especially — thought it simple justice to make the facts known in Palestine, India, Ceylon, Cashmere, Tartary, Thibet, China, and Japan, in all which countries it has influential correspondents. It may also in time have much to say about the conduct of the missionaries to those who contribute to their support.

THEURGIST — From θεος, god, and εργον, work. The first school of practical theurgy in the Christian period was founded by Iamblichus among the Alexandrian Platonists; but the priests attached to the temples of Egypt, Assyria, and Babylonia, and who took an active part in the evocations of the gods during the Sacred Mysteries, were known by this name from the earliest archaic period. The purpose of it was to make spirits visible to the eyes of mortals. A theurgist was one expert in the esoteric learning of the Sanctuaries of all the great countries. The Neoplatonists of the school of Iamblichus were called theurgists, for they performed the so‐called ʺceremonial magic,ʺ and evoked the ʺspiritsʺ of the departed heroes, ʺgods,ʺ and Daimonia (δαιμονια, divine, spiritual entities). In the rare cases when the presence of a tangible and visible spirit was required, the theurgist had to furnish the weird apparition with a portion of his own flesh and blood — he had to perform the theopœa, or the ʺcreation of gods,ʺ by a mysterious process well known to the modern fakirs and initiated Brahmans of India. This is what is said in the Book of

Evocations of the pagodas. It shows the perfect identity of rites and ceremonial between the oldest Brahmanic theurgy and that of the Alexandrian Platonists:

ʺThe Brahman Grihasta (the evocator) must be in a state of complete purity before he ventures to call forth the Pitris.ʺ

After having prepared a lamp, some sandal, incense, etc., and having traced the magic circles taught to him by the superior guru, in order to keep away bad spirits, he ʺceases to breathe, and calls the fire to his help to disperse his body.ʺ He pronounces a certain number of times the sacred word, and ʺhis soul escapes from his body, and his body disappears, and the soul of the evoked spirit descends into the double body and animates it.ʺ Then ʺHis (Grihastaʹs) soul reënters into his body, whose subtile particles have again been aggregating, after having formed of their emanations an aërial body to the spirit he evoked.ʺ

And now, that he has formed for the Pitri a body with the particles the most essential and pure of his own, the grihasta is allowed, after the ceremonial sacrifice is over, to ʺconverse with the souls of the ancestors and the Pitris, and offer them questions on the mysteries of the Being and the transformations of the imperishable.ʺ

ʺThen after having blown out his lamp he must light it again, and set at liberty the bad spirits shut out from the place by the magical circles, and leave the sanctuary of the Pitris.ʺ*

* ʺBook of Brahmanical Evocations,ʺ part iii.

xlviii

Isis Unveiled

The school of Iamblichus was distinct from that of Plotinus and Porphyry, who were strongly against ceremonial magic and practical theurgy as dangerous, though these two eminent men firmly believed in both. ʺThe theurgic or benevolent magic, the Goëtic, or dark and evil necromancy, were alike in preëminent repute during the first century of the Christian era.ʺ* But never have any of the highly moral and pious philosophers, whose fame has descended to us spotless of any evil deed, practiced any other kind of magic than the theurgic, or benevolent, as Bulwer‐Lytton terms it. ʺWhoever is acquainted with the nature of divinely luminous appearances

(φασματα) knows also on what account it is requisite to abstain from all birds (animal food), and especially for him who hastens to be liberated from terrestrial concerns and to be established with the celestial gods,ʺ says Porphyry.†

Though he refused to practice theurgy himself, Porphyry, in his Life of Plotinus, mentions a priest of Egypt, who, ʺat the request of a certain friend of Plotinus (which friend was perhaps Porphyry himself, remarks T. Taylor), exhibited to Plotinus, in the temple of Isis at Rome, the familiar daimon, or, in modern language, the guardian angel of that philosopher.ʺ‡

The popular, prevailing idea was that the theurgists, as well as the magicians, worked wonders, such as evoking the

* Bulwer‐Lytton, ʺLast Days of Pompeii,ʺ p. 147.
† ʺSelect Works,ʺ p. 159.

‡ Ibid., p. 92.

souls or shadows of the heroes and gods, and doing other thaumaturgic works by supernatural powers.

YAJNA — ʺThe Yajna,ʺ say the Brahmans, exists from eternity, for it proceeded forth from the Supreme One, the Brahma‐Prajapâti, in whom it lay dormant from ʺno beginning.ʺ It is the key to the TRAIVIDYA, the thrice sacred science contained in the Rig verses, which teaches the Yagus or sacrificial mysteries. ʺThe Yajnaʺ exists as an invisible thing at all times; it is like the latent power of electricity in an electrifying machine, requiring only the operation of a suitable apparatus in order to be elicited. It is supposed to extend from the Ahavaniya or sacrificial fire to the heavens, forming a bridge or ladder by means of which the sacrificer can communicate with the world of gods and spirits, and even ascend when alive to their abodes.§

This Yajna is again one of the forms of the Akâsa, and the mystic word calling it into existence and pronounced mentally by the initiated Priest is the Lost Word receiving impulse through WILL‐POWER.

To complete the list, we will now add that in the course of the following chapters, whenever we use the term Archaic, we mean before the time of Pythagoras; when Ancient, before the time of Mahomet; and when Mediæval, the period between Mahomet and Martin Luther. It will only be necessary to infringe the rule when from time to time we may have to

§ ʺAitareya Brahmanam,ʺ Introduction.

xlix

Isis Unveiled

speak of nations of a pre‐Pythagorean antiquity, and will adopt the common custom of calling them ʺancient.ʺ

――――

Before closing this initial chapter, we venture to say a few words in explanation of the plan of this work. Its object is not to force upon the public the personal views or theories of its author; nor has it the pretensions of a scientific work, which aims at creating a revolution in some department of thought. It is rather a brief summary of the religions, philosophies, and universal traditions of human kind, and the exegesis of the same, in the spirit of those secret doctrines, of which none — thanks to prejudice and bigotry — have reached Christendom in so unmutilated a form, as to secure it a fair judgment. Since the days of the unlucky mediæval philosophers, the last to write upon these secret doctrines of which they were the depositaries, few men have dared to brave persecution and prejudice by placing their knowledge upon record. And these few have never, as a rule, written for the public, but only for those of their own and succeeding times who possessed the key to their jargon. The multitude, not understanding them or their doctrines, have been accustomed to regard them en masse as either charlatans or dreamers. Hence the unmerited contempt into which the study of the noblest of sciences — that of the spiritual man — has gradually fallen.

In undertaking to inquire into the assumed infallibility of Modern Science and Theology, the author has been forced,

even at the risk of being thought discursive, to make constant comparison of the ideas, achievements, and pretensions of their representatives, with those of the ancient philosophers and religious teachers. Things the most widely separated as to time, have thus been brought into immediate juxtaposition, for only thus could the priority and parentage of discoveries and dogmas be determined. In discussing the merits of our scientific contemporaries, their own confessions of failure in experimental research, of baffling mysteries, of missing links in their chains of theory, of inability to comprehend natural phenomena, of ignorance of the laws of the causal world, have furnished the basis for the present study. Especially (since Psychology has been so much neglected, and the East is so far away that few of our investigators will ever get there to study that science where alone it is understood), we will review the speculations and policy of noted authorities in connection with those modern psychological phenomena which began at Rochester and have now overspread the world. We wish to show how inevitable were their innumerable failures, and how they must continue until these pretended authorities of the West go to the Brahmans and Lamaists of the far Orient, and respectfully ask them to impart the alphabet of true science. We have laid no charge against scientists that is not supported by their own published admissions, and if our citations from the records of antiquity rob some of what they have hitherto viewed as well‐earned laurels, the fault is not ours but Truthʹs. No man worthy of the name of philosopher would care to wear honors that rightfully belong to another.

l

Isis Unveiled

Deeply sensible of the Titanic struggle that is now in progress between materialism and the spiritual aspirations of mankind, our constant endeavor has been to gather into our several chapters, like weapons into armories, every fact and argument that can be used to aid the latter in defeating the former. Sickly and deformed child as it now is, the materialism of To‐Day is born of the brutal Yesterday. Unless its growth is arrested, it may become our master. It is the bastard progeny of the French Revolution and its reaction against ages of religious bigotry and repression. To prevent the crushing of these spiritual aspirations, the blighting of these hopes, and the deadening of that intuition which teaches us of a God and a hereafter, we must show our false theologies in their naked deformity, and distinguish between divine religion and human dogmas. Our voice is raised for spiritual freedom, and our plea made for enfranchisement from all tyranny, whether of SCIENCE or THEOLOGY.

li

Isis Unveiled

THE VEIL OF ISIS

——————————

PART ONE — SCIENCE

——————————

Рейтинг@Mail.ru